۱۳۸۷ دی ۱۵, یکشنبه

Israel's Insane War 02-01-09

First Published 2009-01-02
Israel's Insane War by Patrick Seale

Patrick Seale is a leading British writer on the Middle East

Israel’s war in Gaza is an act of political insanity. It is the product of a deeply disturbed society, able neither to curb its military arrogance nor calm its profound paranoia. The consequences are likely to be painful for Israel’s long-term prospects.

By radicalising the Palestinians, and by arousing great anger in the Arab and Muslim world, this savage war rules out the possibility of Israel’s peaceful integration in the region for the foreseeable future. That may even be its cynical aim, since Israel wants dominance, not peaceful coexistence.

As the F-16s carry out their missions of death, the message to the world is that Israel will continue to live by the sword, as it has done for the past six decades, rather than risk the concessions and compromises which peace would require.

The war has, in fact, confirmed what had long been apparent, namely that Israel has no interest in a negotiated peace. Peace means retraction, it means ceding territory, whereas Israel is still bent on expansion. That is what the continued theft of West Bank land and the mushrooming settlements are all about, together with the demolition of Palestinian homes, the security wall, the settlers-only road network, the stifling of the Palestinian economy by over 600 checkpoints, and countless other cruel vexations.

Peace is, indeed, the main casualty of this war. It is as dead as the corpses in Gaza. The two-state solution has been dealt a deathblow. The tentative Israeli-Syrian talks have been firmly shut down. The Arab Peace Plan, which offered Israel peace and normal relations with all 22 Arab states if it withdrew to its 1967 borders, has been buried in a welter of blood and bomb wreckage.

One of Israel’s war aims must surely have been to pre-empt any attempt by the incoming US administration of Barack Obama to re-launch the moribund peace process. Valuable months will now be lost clearing up the mess. As for the outgoing Bush administration, the blatant lies of Condoleezza Rice, who blamed the war solely on Hamas, must serve as the damning political epitaph of the most ineffectual US Secretary of State of modern times.

Israel has never liked Palestinian moderates, for the simple reason that concessions might have to be made to them. To avoid being drawn into negotiations, it has always preferred Palestinian radicals -- and when they were not there it has done everything it could to create them. “How can you negotiate with someone who wants to kill you?” is a familiar Israeli refrain.

The war on Gaza has confirmed Israel’s visceral rejection of any expression of Palestinian nationalism. It will kill to prevent it, as sixty years of wars, assassinations and massacres testify. Consciously or not, Israeli leaders seem to fear that any recognition of Palestinian aspirations undermines the legitimacy of their own national enterprise.

It may be that the war was launched precisely because Hamas has recently shown signs of moderation. Its key spokesmen -- including Khaled Mish‘al, head of its political bureau -- have expressed their readiness to accept a Palestinian state within the 1967 borders. To Israel’s dismay, they have begun to distance themselves from the movement’s 1987 charter, which calls for Israel’s destruction.

The Qassam rockets were a great embarrassment to the Israeli government. It was unable to stop them except by agreeing to a truce. The rockets angered an Israeli population notoriously blind to any suffering but its own. But, in truth, the rockets were no more than highly irritating pin-pricks. The figures speak for themselves. Fewer than 20 Israelis have been killed by Qassam rockets since Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005. In the same period Israel, displaying its usual astonishing indifference to Arab life, has killed some 2,000 Palestinians. Israeli state terror has been incomparably more lethal than anything Hamas could manage. The death toll continues to mount.

Israel never liked the truce with Hamas and chose not to respect its terms. Instead of easing the blockade on Gaza -- as it was meant to do -- it tightened it, reducing the crowded, suffering Strip to abject misery. And it unilaterally broke the truce by an armed incursion on 4 November, which killed several Hamas men. In retrospect, this action must be seen as a deliberate attempt to provoke Hamas into a violent response, and thus provide Israel with a casus belli.

Stopping the rockets fired by Hamas into the Negev was indeed only one of several reasons Israel went to war, and by no means the most important one. If anything, the rockets have provided Israel with a pretext for launching a war with far wider aims.

The principal aim of Israel’s all-out war on Hamas is to reaffirm the military supremacy over all its neighbours which the Jewish state has enjoyed since its creation in 1948. The war is therefore meant as a warning to Hizbullah in Lebanon, as well as to Syria and Iran -- and indeed to anyone who might dare challenge Israel’s predominance -- that they, too, could face the sort of devastating punishment Gaza is now enduring.

Deterrence -- one-sided, Israel-only deterrence -- lies at the heart of Israel’s security doctrine. It wants total freedom to hit, and never to be hit back. It relies on brute force to protect itself, and rejects any form of mutual deterrence. It is totally opposed to a regional balance of power which might force it to moderate its actions.

In recent years, however, Israel’s deterrent capability has been somewhat dented by challenges from Hizbullah, Hamas and Iran. Hizbullah held Israel to a draw in the 2006 Lebanon war, while Hamas’ rockets compelled a reluctant Israel to agree a truce. Even more seriously from Israel’s point of view, the United States resisted Israeli pressure to make war on Iran, whose nuclear programme Israel has insisted on portraying as an ‘existential’ threat. The truth is that if the Islamic Republic were ever to reach a nuclear threshold Israel’s freedom to strike its neighbours would very probably be curtailed.

Throughout the truce with Hamas, which started some six months ago on 19 June, Israel’s Defence Minister Ehud Barak devoted himself to planning for the war, which he and Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni have now unleashed. Long and careful preparations for the assault were made in the months of relative quiet. The last thing Israel could accept was that Hamas might acquire any deterrent capability of its own, however minimal.

This is what Barak meant when he said that Israel’s intention was “totally to change the rules of the game.” Resistance to Israel of any sort is not to be allowed. Hamas has to be destroyed and rooted out of Gaza altogether. It remains to be seen what the longer-term consequences of this folly might be.

Israel goes to the polls on 10 February, a few short weeks from now. The outcome of the war could determine whether Barak, the murderous architect of the Gaza war, can claw back support for his Labour Party from Tzipi Livni’s Kadima and from Binyamin Netanyahu’s hard-right Likud.

It is tempting to see the war as little more than a cynical electoral ploy by Barak and Livni, aimed at enhancing their respective prospects and keeping Netanyahu at bay. In fact, all Israel’s political leaders gave their approval to the war, whatever their party affiliation. All are drunk with military power. All cheered the mounting Palestinian casualties. None seems able to come to terms with what a real peace might entail. Perhaps none of them can truly believe that Israel’s crimes can ever be forgiven or forgotten, and that they have no option, therefore, but to go on killing.

Patrick Seale is a leading British writer on the Middle East, and the author of The Struggle for Syria; also, Asad of Syria: The Struggle for the Middle East; and Abu Nidal: A Gun for Hire.

۱۳۸۷ خرداد ۲۶, یکشنبه

Men

It's not so complicated!
The nice men are ugly.
The handsome men are not nice.
The handsome and nice men are gay.
The handsome, nice and heterosexual men are married.
The men who are not so handsome, but are nice men, have no money.

The men who are not so handsome, but are nice men with money think we
are only after their money.

The handsome men without money are after our money.

The handsome men, who are not so nice and somewhat heterosexual,
don't think we are beautiful enough.

The men who think we are beautiful, that are heterosexual, somewhat
nice and have money are pigs.

The men who are somewhat handsome, somewhat nice and have some money
and thank GOD are heterosexual, are shy and NEVER MAKE THE FIRST MOVE!

The men who never make the first move, automatically lose interest in us
when we take the initiative.

A flight to Tehran





A British Airways flight was going to Tehran from London .

When it got close to Tehran it started having some kind of troubles.

The pilot contacted the control tower at Tehran airport and asked for help:

" Tehran , this is Captain Smith, British Airways flight 000, do you hear me?"

" Felight 000, dis iz Tehran felight contorol, go ahead"

" Tehran , this is flight 000, we have a problem"
"Dis iz Tehran , vat kind of peroblem?"
" This is flight 000, we have lost power to our engines, please advice"
"Dis iz Tehran , I reed you, peleez check some sings for me, ok?"
" This is flight 000, go ahead"
"Dis iz Tehran , can you get emerzency pover to your enzines?"
" This is flight 000, negative, no power is available"
"Dis iz Tehran , can you peleez bering your altitutde to 20,000 feet?"
" This is flight 000, negative, our wing controls do not respond"
"Dis iz Tehran , can you peleez see if you can lover your veels?"
" This is flight 000, negative, landing gears are stuck"
"Dis iz Tehran , vould you peleez repeet theez vords after me"
" This is flight 000, go ahead"
"Dis iz Tehran , repeet theez words peleez:

ASH'HADO ANNA LA ILAHA ELLALLAH VA ASH'HADO ANNA MOHAMMADAN RASUL ALLAH 



The chicken


Why the chicken crossed the road…
BARACK OBAMA: The chicken crossed the road because it was time for a CHANGE! The chicken wanted CHANGE!

JOHN MC CAIN:
My friends, that chicken crossed the road because he recognized the need to engage in cooperation and dialogue with all the chickens on the other side of the road.

HILLARY CLINTON:
When I was First Lady, I personally helped that little chicken to cross the road. This experience makes me uniquely qualified to ensure — right from Day One! — that every chicken in this country gets the chance it deserves to cross the road. But then, this really isn't about me 

GEORGE W. BUSH:
We don't really care why the chicken crossed the road. We just want to know if the chicken is on our side of the road, or not. The chicken is either against us, or for us. There is no middle ground here

BILL CLINTON:
I did not cross the road with THAT chicken. What is your definition of chicken?

AL GORE:
I invented the chicken! 

DICK CHENEY:
Where's my gun

۱۳۸۷ فروردین ۱۷, شنبه

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS



Rule # 1: In the Middle East, it is always the Arabs that attack first, and it's always Israel who defends itself. This is called "Retaliation".

Rule # 2: The Arabs, whether Palestinians or Lebanese, are not allowed to kill Israelis. This is called "Terrorism"

Rule # 3: Israel has the right to kill Arab civilians, this is called "Self-Defense", or these days "Collateral Damage".

Rule # 4: When Israel kills too many civilians. The Western world calls for restraint. This is called the "Reaction of the International Community".

Rule # 5: Palestinians and Lebanese do not have the right to capture Israeli military, not even a limited number, not even 1 or 2. This is called "Kidnapping".

Rule # 6: Israel has the right to capture as many Palestinians as they want (Palestinians: around 10000 to date, 300 of which are children, Lebanese: 1000s to date, being held without trial). There is no limit; there is no need for proof of guilt or trial. This is called "War on Terrorism".

Rule # 7: When you say "Hezbollah", always be sure to add "supported by Syria and Iran". this is called: "Axis of Evil"

Rule # 8: When you say "Israel", never say "supported by the USA, the UK and other European countries", for people (God forbid) might believe this is not an equal conflict. This is called "Helping our Friends".

Rule # 9: When it comes to Israel, don't mention the words "occupied territories", "UN resolutions", "Geneva conventions". This could distress the audience and is called "Anti-Semitism".

Rule # 10: Israelis speak better English than Arabs. This is why we let them speak out as much as possible, so that they can explain rules.

1 through 9. This is called "Neutral Journalism".

Rule # 11: If you don't agree with these rules or if you favor the Arab side over the Israeli side, you must be a very dangerous anti-Semite.
-------------------------------------------------
Please learn the proper terminology and use it appropriately to maintain your job; this is called "Equal Opportunity Employment"

۱۳۸۶ بهمن ۲۲, دوشنبه

زندگي زيباست زشتي‌هاي آن تقصير ماست،

زندگي زيباست زشتي‌هاي آن تقصير ماست،
در مسيرش هرچه نازيباست آن تدبير ماست!
زندگي آب رواني است روان مي‌گذرد...
آنچه تقدير من و توست همان مي‌گذرد
اي که مي پرسي نشــان عــشـق چيــست؟
عـــشق چيزي جــز ظــــهور مـهر نيست!
عـــشق يـــعني مهــر بـي چــــون و چـرا
عـــشق يـــعني کــــوشــش بـــي ادعــا
عـــشق يـــعني مهــر بـي امـــا ، اگــــر
عـــشق يـــعني رفـــتـنِ بــا پـــاي ســر
عـــشق يـــعني دل تـپـيدن بـهـر دوسـت
عـــشق يـــعني جـــان مـن قربــان اوست
عـــشق يـــعني خـــواندن از چشمـــان او
حـــرف هـــاي دل ، بــــدون گـفــتــگـو
عـــشق يـــعني عــــاشق بـــي زحــمـتي
عـــشق يـــعني بـــوســه ي بـي شهــوتي
عـــشق، يـــــارِ مــهــــربــــان زنـدگي
بــــادبـــــان و نــردبــــان زنــــدگــي
عـــشق يـــعني دشــت گلکـــاري شـــده
در کـــــويـــري چشمه اي جـــاري شـده
يـــک شقايــق در ميـــــان دشتِ خــــار
بـــاور امــکان بــــا يـک گــــل بهــــار
در خــــــزاني بـــرگــريز و زرد و سخـت
عـــشق، تــــابِ آخـــرين بـرگ درخــت
عـــشــق يــــعني روح را آراســـتـــــن
بـــي شـمـــار افــتــادن و بــرخــاسـتـن
عـــشق يــعني زشــتي زيــبــــا شــــده
عـــشق يـــعني گـــنگي گـــويــا شـــده
عـــشق يـــعني مهـــربـــاني در عـــمـل
خــلــق کــيـفـيــت بـــه کـنـدوي عسل
عـــشق يـــعني گُـل بـه جــاي خـار بـاش
پـــــل بــــه جـاي ايـن هـمه ديـوار باش
عـــشق يـــعني يـــک نــگـاه آشــنـــــا
ديــــدن افــتـــادگــان زيــــر پـــــــا
زيــــر لــب بــــا خــــود تــرنـم داشتن
بــــر لــب غـمگــين تــبــســم کـاشـتن
عـــشق ، آزادي ، رهــــــــايي ، ايـــمـني
عـــشق ، زيـبــايـــي ، زلا لـــي ، روشــني
عـــشق يـــعـني تُـنـگ بـي مـــاهـي شده
عـــشق يـــعني مــــاهــي راهـي شـــده
عـــشق يـــعني آهـــــــويــي آرام و رام
عـــشق صـــيـــادي بـدون تــيـــر و دام
هــــر کجــا عشــق آيـــد و ساکــن شود
هـــر چـــه نــا ممکن بــود ممکن شـــود
در جــــهان هــر کـارِ خوب و ماندني است
رد پــــاي عـــشق در او ديــدنــي اســت
شعــــرهــــاي خـــوبِ ديــوان جهــــان
شرح عـــشق است و ســرود عــــاشقــان
((سالــک)) آري ، عشق رمزي در دل است
شرح و وصف عشق، کاري مشـــکل اســـت
عشـــق يعنــــي شـور هسـتي در کــــلام
عـــشق يــعني شــعــر ، مستي ، والســلام

بوديم و كسي پاس نمي‌داشت كه هستيم / باشد كه نباشيم و بدانند كه بوديم

حرمت اعتبار خودرا هرگز در میدان مقایسه ی خویش با دیگران مشکن
که ما هر یک یگانه ایم
موجودی بی نظیر و بی تشابه .
و آرمان های خویش را به مقیاس معیارهای دیگران بنیاد مکن
تنها تو می دانی که "بهترین" در زندگانیت چگونه معنا می شود
از کنار آنچه باقلب تو نزدیک است
آسان مگذر
بر آنها چنگ در انداز ، آنچنانکه بر زندگی خویش
که بی حضور آنان ، زندگی مفهوم خود را از دست می دهد.
با دم زدن در هوای گذشته و نگرانی فرداهای نیامده
زندگی را مگذار که از لابلای انگشتانت فرو لغزد و آسان هدر شود.
هر روز همان روز را زندگی کن و بدینسان تمامی عمر را به کمال زیسته ای
و هرگز امید را از کف مده آنگاه که چیز دیگری برای دادن در کف داری.
همه چیز در آن لحظه ای به پایان می رسد که قدم های تو باز می ایستد
و هراسی به خود راه مده از پذیرفتن این حقیقت که هنوز پله ای تا کمال فاصله باشد.
تنها پیوند میان ما خط نازک همین فاصله است
برخیز و بی هراس خطر کن ، درهرفرصتی بیاویز
وهم بدین سان است که به مفهوم "شجاعت" دست خواهی یافت.
آنگاه که بگویی دیگر نخواهمش یافت
عشق را از زندگی خویش رانده ای
عشق چنان است که هر چه بیشتر ارزانی داری سرشارتر شود
و هرگاه که آن راتنگ در مشت گیری آسانتر از کف رود
پروازش ده تا پایدار بماند
رؤیاهایت را فرومگذار که بی آنان زندگانی را امیدی نیست
و بی امید زندگی را آهنگی نباشد
از روزهایت شتابان گذر مکن
که در التهاب این شتاب نه تنها نقطه ی سرآغاز خویش
که حتی سرمنزل مقصود را گم کنی
زندگی مسابقه نیست ، زندگی یک سفر است
و تو آن مسافری باش که در هرگامش
ترنم خوش لحظه ها جاری است

بوديم و كسي پاس نمي‌داشت كه هستيم / باشد كه نباشيم و بدانند كه بوديم

۱۳۸۶ بهمن ۱۹, جمعه

تو میگی من میگم

من ميگم بهم نگاه كن

تو ميگي كه جون فدا كن

من ميگم چشات قشنگه

تو ميگي دنيا دو رنگه

من ميگم چه قدر تو ماهي

تو ميگي اول راهي

من ميگم بمون هميشه

تو ميگي ببين نميشه

من مي گم خيلي غريبم

تو ميگي نده فريبم

من ميگم خوابت رو ديدم

تو ميگي ديگه بريدم

من مي گم هدف وصاله

تو ميگي واي محاله

من ميگم يه عمره سوختم

تو ميگي قلبم رو دوختم

من ميگم چشمات و وا كن

تو ميگي من و رها كن

من ميگم خيلي ديوونم

تو ميگي آره مي دونم

من ميگم دلم شكسته ست

تو ميگي خوب ميشه خسته ست

من ميگم بشين كنارم

تو ميگي دوستت ندارم

من ميگم بهم نظر كن

تو ميگي برو سفر كن

من ميگم واسم دعا كن

تو ميگي نذر رضا كن

من ميگم قلبم رو نشكن

تو ميگي من مي شكنم من ؟

من ميگم واست مي ميرم

تو ميگي نمي پذيرم

من ميگم شدم فراموش؟

تو ميگي نه ، رفتم از هوش

من ميگم كه رفتم از ياد ؟

تو ميگي نه مرده فرهاد

من ميگم باز شدي حيروون ؟

تو ميگي بيچاره مجنون

من ميگم ازم بريدي ؟

تو مي پرسي نا اميدي ؟

من ميگم واسم عزيزي

تو ميگي زبون ميريزي؟

من ميگم تو خيلي نازي

تو ميگي غرق نيازي

من ميگم دلم رو بردي

تو ميگي به من سپردي ؟

من ميگم كردم تعجب

تو ميگي ديگه بگو خب

من ميگم تنهايي سخته

تو ميگي اين دست بخته

من ميگم دل تو رفته

تو ميگي هفت روزه هفته

من ميگم راه تو دوره

تو ميگي چاره عبوره

من ميگم مي خوام بشم گم

تو ميگي حرفاي مردم ؟

من ميگم نگذري ساده ؟

تو ميگي آدم زياده

من ميگم دل به تو بستن ؟

تو ميگي اينقده هستن

من ميگم تنهام ميذاري ؟

تو ميگي طاقت نداري ؟

من ميگم خدا به همرات

تو ميگي چه تلخه حرفات

من ميگم اهل بهشتي

تو ميگي چه سرنوشتي

من ميگم كه غرق دردم

تو ميگي مي خوام بگردم

من ميگم چيزي مي خواستي ؟

تو ميگي تشنمه راستي

من ميگم از غم آبه

تو ميگي دلم كبابه

من مي گم برو كنارش

تو ميگي رفت پيش يارش

من ميگم با تو چيكار كرد ؟

تو ميگي كشت و فرار كرد

من ميگم چيزي گذاشته ؟

تو ميگي دو خط نوشته

من ميگم بختش سياهه

تو ميگي اون بي گناهه

من ميگم رفته كه حالا

تو مي گي مونده خيالا

من ميگم مي آد يه روزي

تو ميگي داري مي سوزي

من ميگم رنگت چه زرده

تو مي پرسي بر ميگرده ؟

من ميگم بياد الهي

تو ميگي كه خيلي ماهي

من ميگم ماهت سفر كرد

تو ميگي تو رو خبر كرد ؟

من ميگم هر كي با ماهش

تو ميگي بار گناهش؟

من ميگم تو بي وفايي

تو ميگي بريم يه جايي

من ميگم دلم اسيره

تو ميگي نه خيلي ديره

من ميگم خدا بزرگه

تو ميگي زندگي گرگه

من ميگم عاشق پرنده ست

تو ميگي معشوق برنده ست

من ميگم به روزها شك كن

تو ميگي بهم كمك كن

من ميگم خدانگهدار

تو ميگي تا چي بخواد يار

من ميگم كه تا قيامت

برو زيبا به سلامت

پشت تو آب نمي ريزم

كه نروندت عزيزم

۱۳۸۶ دی ۲۷, پنجشنبه

● آلرژی های مردانه :

خیلی ها " یعنی آغایون " همیشه این شبهه براشون پیش میاد که کرم از خود درخته " یعنی زنان " و اونها هستن که مردها رو تحریک میکنن و
آمپرشونو بالا میبرن ! حالا من میخوام ثابت کنم که کرم از خود کرمه " آغایون " ! خیلی از آغایون به بعضی رفتار و حرکات و گفتار خانم ها
آلرژی های عجیبی دارند که گاه باعث فعل و انفعالات غریبه عجیبی توی بدنشون میشه که هم منشاء فیزیکی داره و هم شیمیایی و هم روحی و
روانی :
- عامل فیزیکی : بلند شدن اسافل و آلات و ادوات
- عامل شیمیایی : ترشحات تهوع آور و
- عامل روحی روانی : خواب نما شدن و عاشق شدن و جنون
اما بعضی عوامل هم هست که نمیشه ازشون صرفه نظر کرد بعنوان مثال : بوسه , رقصیدن , لخت شدن , نوع لباس , جملات عاشقانه و
احساسی بیان کردن , حرکات جلف انجام دادن و ... همه و همه میتونه آغایون رو به مرز جنون شهوانی بکشونه ! گرچه شما کجای دنیا شما مرد
عاقلی دیدن که یه جو عقل تو سرش باشه و بتونه این احساساتشو افسار بزنه و جلوی رم کردن حسش رو بگیره ؟ .... آقا اصلا یافت می نشود
بیخود نگردین !!!! و به همین خاطر همین آغایون که همه جا دم از : " من آنم که آلتم بود پر دوام ...... " میزنن , یک چیز رو در وجودشون
ندارن بنام جنبه ! اصولا مردهای ایرانی شدیدا بی جنبه هستن و فکر میکنن زن یا دختری که باهاشون راحت ارتباط برقرار می کنه و یا
صمیمیه دیگه باید بکوبنش زمین و یا علی مدد ..... شیرجه .. زیر یه خم .... ! دیگه نمیدونن که طرف بهشون شحصیت داده و براشون احترام
قائل شده که داره باهاشون ابراز صمیمیت میکنه و فکر میکنه اونها هم جنبه اش رو دارن دیگه نمیدونن که مردها در اون لحظه تو ذهنشون فقط
سه حرف نقش میبنده در مواجهه با یک زن ریلکس : س ک س S E X

بر خلاف چیزی که همه شما غیاث آبادی ها فکر میکنین من از مردها متنفر نیستم و براشون میمیرم اما مرد داریم تا مرد ! مردی که از مرد
بودن فقط اسم مرد و یدک کشیدن آلتش رو بهمراه داشته باشه بدرد جرز لای دیوار میخوره ! معمولا هم تو زندگی شخصیم با مردها مشکلی
ندارم اما همیشه انگار مردها با من مشکل شدیدا سیستماتیک و بغرنجی دارن ! نشد من با کسی دوست بشم یا ارتباط برقرار کنم و این دوستی
بخوبی و خوشی و بدون برخورد فیزیکی به سرانجامی برسه ! تا بحال نشده با مردی بتونم بیشتر از یک ساعت نهایت دو ساعت بشینم و دو
کلمه حرف حساب بزنم ! یا آغا ویار سکسش گرفته و یا از جملات بی ناموسی و تقاضاهای آنچنانی قلبش پرده برداری کرده و در آخر طوری
شده که حس کردم اگه یا برخورد فیزیکی باهاش نکنم و یا کاکتوس عشقش رو از ریشه خشک نکنم , احتمالا نه ماه دیگه چند قلو پس انداختنم
حتمیه و برای همین هم بوده که همیشه دوستی با مردهای زن دار رو به دوستی با عزب اوغلی ها ترجیح دادم هر چند همشون یه پُخی هستن !
بیایین تصور کنیم رفتیم یه مهمونی :

- وقتی توی یه مهمونی نشستی و داری با مردی صحبت میکنی مثلا راجع به اوضاع سیاسی و اجتماعی کشورت و دنیا ... اول اینکه طرف اگه
بحث اجتماعی باشه میره سراغ زیاد شدن فواحش و زنهای خیابانی و فساد و ..... اگه بحث سیاسی باشه طرف میره سراغ تجارت بین المللی
سکس و زنان و ..... اگه بحث تاریخی باشه طرف میره سراغ رفتارهای وحشیانه جنسی علیه زنان در طول تاریخ . اگه بحث علمی و پزشکی
باشه طرف دونه دونه قسمتهای بی ناموسی بدنت رو برات تشریح میکنه و از حاملگی و پریود و انزال و .... میگه ! اگه بحث جنگی باشه
طرف جنایات جنگی و نسل کشی و تجاوز به زنان رو در طول جنگها به رخت میکشه ! خلاصه میبینی که هر چقدر که زمان می گذره کم کم
حالت چشمهاش عوض میشه و یک جور خاصی نگاهت میکنه ! آه ..... چه شود .... پاهاش نم نمک تیک میگیرن و هر چند دقیقه یکبار وقتی
صورتت به سمت مخالف میره چشمهاش خیلی سریع روی نقاطی از بدنت زوم میشه و شروع به رکورد میکنه و به محض اینکه نگاهش میکنی
, فیلم بردازی تموم میشه و دوباره به چشمهات خیره میشه یعنی جون عمه اش داشته به حرفهات گوش میداده اما مطمئن باشین در این حالت به
تنها چیزی که داره فکر میکنه , چیزیه که زیر لباستون وجود داره , بدنتون ! صد درصد هم مطمئن باشین یک کلمه از حرفهاتون رو نمی فهمه
و فقط مثل گاو مش رمضون سرشو تکون میده و تاییدت میکنه ! برای امتحان میتونی چند تا فحش خوار مادر بهش بدی لابلای حرفهات تا ببینی
که با سر تاییدت هم میکنه !!!!

- توی ادارات این روابط بیشتر به چشم میخورن مخصوصا بین کارمندان زن و مرد :

وقتی اداره میرفتم گاهی پیش میاومد که خواب می موندم و نمی تونستم صبحانه بخورم برای همین تند تند هر چی دستم می اومد می چپوندم تو
کیفم و راه می افتادم اداره ! وقتی میرسیدم و از هفت خان حراست میگذشتم و میرفتم تو اتاق خودم و می نشستم تازه یادم می افتاد که چایی با
خودم نیاوردم ! آخه یه پارچ برقی داشتم که توش چایی درست میکردم ! یکبار رفتم سراغ یکی از همکارها تو سایت تا ازش دو تا تی بگ
بگیرم ! تا منو میدید کلی تحویل گرفت و بعد هم یواشکی بهش گفتم چی میخوام و اونم انگار داره بهم هروئین میده پیچیدش لای دستمال کاغذی و
گفت بیا نزدیک میز تا بذارم تو جیبت ! رفتن همان و بماند که دست رفتن توی جیب مانتو مساوی شد با چه کاری !!!!! فقط عکس العمل من این
بود که موقع رفتن هدیه ارزنده اش رو جلوی چشم خودش با حرص پرت میکردم تو سطل آشغال و رفتم اتاق خودم ! به این میگن نهایت اعتماد
یک زن به یک مرد و نهایت سوء استفاده و رذالت یک مرد از یک زن !

اما بعضی آغایون هستن که به بعضی از لغتهایی که خانم ها بیان می کنن آلرژی دارن ! حالا قصد ندارم لغت نامه دهخدا یا سکسنامه ایرج میرزا
رو باز کنم و دونه دونه لغتهای سکسی و بی ناموسی رو براتون مثال بزنم اما چند تا لغت داریم که وقتی خانمها بیان می کنن فلان آقا یهو مثل
چاقوی ضامن دار میپره هوا !!!!!
- عزیزم : جدیدا نمیدونم چی شده به هر کی نامه میدم یا باهاش حرف میزنم و توش بهش میگم عزیزم , طرف خوش به حالش میشه و فکر میکنه
WOW نه خبره ؟؟؟؟؟؟؟
- جون : کافیه اسم کسی رو با جون بیاری مثل مثلا اصغر جون , جواد جون , علی جون و ..... ! دیگه طرف فکر میکنه باید همین الان بکوبت
زمین ......
- خیلی باحالی : این جمله خیلی خطرناکه ! باعث میشه طرف هم خوش به حالش بشه و هم فکرش پر بکشه به زیر شکمش ....
می بوسمت : این یکی رو هیچ وقت به زبون نیارین چون با این کار کلنگ ساختن دو قلوها رو زدین ! از ما گفتن ...
آخی : کافیه این حرف رو بزنی تا احساسات قندیل زده مردها رو ذوب کنی !!! اصلا این لغت جادویی خیلی کاربرد داره ! مثلا وقتی یه سگ رو
که ماشین زیرش کرده میبینی میگی آخی نازی ..... اما درست بر عکس همون هم وقتی یه مرد رو میبینی که تانک از روش رد شده و پخش
زمین شده بازم میگی آخی حیوونی !

خلاصه که این واژگان بد جوری آدمیزاد رو اغفال میکنه و باعث مسائلی میشه که گاه جبران پذیر نیستند و چقدر خوبه آدم طرفش رو بشناسه و
بعد جملاتش رو بلغور کنه ! اما در کل شما مردها خیلی بی جنبه تشریف دارین !!!!! همین و بس !

نوشته شده توسط شیوا

۱۳۸۶ مهر ۱۹, پنجشنبه

The Bankruptcy of America, the Corporate United States,and the New World Order

The Other Side of Mirror
Who runs America


Did you ever hear of the Independent Treasury Act of 1921? No, you say.... Hmmmmmmm....?

"Just the Facts Ma'am"

Who Is Running America?

The Bankruptcy of America, the Corporate United States,and the New World Order

Who is running America? Have you ever asked that question?

Under the doctrine of Parens Patriae, "Government As Parent", as a result of the manipulated bankruptcy of the United States of America in 1930, ALL the assets of the American people, their person, and of the country itself are held by the Depository Trust Corporation at 55 Water Street, NY, NY, secured by UCC Commercial Liens, which are then monetized as "debt money" by the Federal Reserve. It may interest you to know that under the umbrella of the Depository Trust Corporation lies the CEDE Corporation, the Federal Reserve Corporation and the American Bar Association, the legal arm of the banking interests.


Now you know who is running America!

You might want to take exception to the name on the marquee at the entrance to 55 Water Street. . . . "Tower of Power" . . . ???


The Independent Treasury Act of 1921 suspended the de jure (meaning "by right of legal establishment") Treasury Department of the United States government. U.S. Congress turned the treasury department over to a private corporation, the Federal Reserve and their agents. The bulk of the ownership of the Federal Reserve System, a very well kept secret from the American Citizen and the world, is held by these banking interests:

Rothschild Bank of London
Rothschild Bank of Berlin
Warburg Bank of Hamburg
Warburg Bank of Amsterdam
Lazard Brothers of Paris
Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy
Chase Manhattan Bank of New York
Goldman, Sachs of New York
Lehman Brothers of New York
Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York

Thomas Jefferson once said:

"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies . . . If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] . . . will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered . . . The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs." -- Thomas Jefferson -- The Debate Over The Re-charter Of The Bank Bill,
(1809)


Jefferson's prophesy has come true.

How did this happen? ......Hmmmmm..... Well, that is going to take a while to explain.

U.S. law is private law, written by The National Law Institute, Law Professors, and the Bar Association, the Agents of Foreign Banking interests. They have come to this position of writing the law by fraudulently deleting the "Titles of Nobility and Honor" Thirteenth Amendment from the Constitution for the United States, creating an oligarchy of Lawyers and Bankers controlling all three branches of U.S. government.

The Federal Register Act was created by Pres. Roosevelt in 1935. Title 3 sec. 301 et seq. by Executive Order. He gave himself the power to create federal agencies and appoint a head of the agency. He then re-delegated his authority to make law (statutory regulations) to those agency heads. One big problem there, the president has no constitutional authority to make law. Under the U.S. Constitution re-delegation of delegated authority is a felony breach.

The U.S. president then gave the agencies the authority to tax. We now have government by appointment running that country. This is the shadow government sometimes spoken about, but never referred to as government by appointment. This type of government represents taxation without representation.

Perhaps this is why some people believe the U.S. Constitution was suspended. It wasn't suspended, it was buried in bureaucratic red tape.

Now, it is a historical fact that with the Declaration of Independence, to provide a united effort during and after the War for Independence, the Colonies as independent nations joined together under the Articles of Confederation, and as Independent Sovereign States drew up constitutions which formed governments to serve the people of each former colony. The Articles of Confederation, after a
period of 11 years, were determined to have several flaws. The Congress of delegates called a Convention in 1787 to correct the flaws. The Convention, instead of modifying the Articles of Confederation as directed, in secret sessions took it upon themselves to write an entirely new Constitution, which when ratified by the State Conventions of the Freemen of the Individual States, created the Federal government to serve them in those areas where the States operating individually could not effectively serve. In this new Constitution the people and the States delegated to the Federal government certain responsibilities, reserving all rights not so enumerated to the States and to the People in the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution. As a consequence, the responsibility of the State became one of protecting the people from the tyranny of federal government, to insure that the federal government did not reach beyond the bounds of the Constitution. This worked fairly effectively, until 1933 when Roosevelt assumed office.

The Conference of Chief Justices, Conference of State Court Administrators, the National Associations of Attorney Generals, Secretaries of State and State Auditors, State Purchasing Offices, Lieutenant Governors, and State Legislators, and the Governors of the 50 states comprise the membership of the Council of State Governments. The Council of State Governments is located at 676 N. ST. Clair, Chicago, Illinois 60611.

The Council of State Governments has now been absorbed into the National Conference on Uniform State Laws run by the Bar Association.

The movement for uniform state laws dates back more than a century. The Alabama State Bar called for uniformity as early as 1881, but it was nearly a decade later, at the 12th annual meeting of the ABA in 1889, that the legal community made its formal motion to work for uniformity in the then 44 state union. New York was the first state to move, appointing three commissioners in 1890. Other states soon heeded the call: Delaware, Georgia, Massachusetts, Michigan, New
York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania attended the first Conference in Saratoga Springs, New York, in 1892. The commissioners wasted no time. They urged adoption of three acts and proposed raising the marrying age to 18 for males and 16 for females. They also adopted a table of weights and measures, noting that with the exception of wheat, legal weights of a bushel varied in all the states.

By the turn of the century, 33 states and two territories had appointed commissioners on uniform laws. In 1910, only Nevada and the Territory of Alaska still had not; they came aboard in 1912.



What does that have to do with anything? Uniform Laws seem to be a good Idea.


Well now, that is a good question. Let us continue.....


An Expose On The Legal Fraud Perpetrated On All Americans

THE COURTS RECOGNIZE ONLY TWO CLASSES OF PEOPLE IN THE UNITED STATES TODAY: DEBTORS AND CREDITORS

The concept of DEBTORS and CREDITORS is very important to understand.

In the U.S., every legal action where you are brought before the court: e.g. traffic ticket, property dispute or permits, income tax, credit cards, bank loans or anything else government might dream up to charge you where you find yourself in front of a court. It is an equity court, administrating commercial law having a debtor-creditor law as the controlling law. Today, U.S. has an equity court but not an
equity court as defined by the Constitution of the United States or any other legal documents before 1938.

All the courts of this once great land have been changed starting with the Supreme Court decision of 1938 in ERIE V. THOMPKINS. I'll give you background which led to this decision. There is a terrible FRAUD being perpetrated on all Americans. Please understand that this fraud is a 24 hour, 7 days a week, year after year continuous fraud. This fraud is constantly upon the American citizens all their life. It doesn't just happen once in a while. This fraud is perpetually and incessantly upon them and their family.


U.S. INC. GOES TO GENEVA 1930's

In order for you to understand just how this fraud works, you need to know the history of its inception.

It goes like this: From 1928 -1932 there were five years of Geneva conventions. The nations of the world met in Geneva Switzerland for 5 continuous years in order to set up what would be the policy of all the participating countries. During the year of 1930 the U.S., Great Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Portugal etc. all declared bankruptcy. If you try to look up the 1930 minutes, you will not find
them because they don't publish this particular volume. If you try to find the 1930 volume which contains the minutes of what happened, you will probably not find it. This volume has been pulled out of circulation or is hidden in the library and is very hard to find. This volume contains the evidence of the bankruptcy.

Going into 1932, they stopped meeting in Geneva. In 1932 Franklin Roosevelt came into power as President of the United States. Roosevelt's job was to put into place and administer the bankruptcy that had been declared two years earlier. The corporate government needed a key Supreme Court decision. The corporate United States government had to have a legal case on the books to set the stage for recognizing, implementing and supporting the bankruptcy. Now. this doesn't mean the bankruptcy wasn't implemented before 1938 with the Erie vs. Thompkins decision. The bankruptcy started in 1930-1931. The bankruptcy definitely started when Roosevelt came into office. He was sworn in during the month of January 1933. He started right away in the bankruptcy with what is known as 'The Banking Holiday," and proceeded in pulling the gold coin out of circulation. That was the
beginning of the corporate United States Public Policy for bankruptcy.. Executive Orders 6073, 6102, 6111 & Executive Order 6260 "Trading With The Enemy Act."


ROOSEVELT STACKS SUPREME COURT

It is a known historical fact that during 1933 and 1937 - 1938, there was a big fight between Roosevelt and the Supreme Court Justices. Roosevelt tried to stack the Supreme court with a bunch of his pals. Roosevelt tried to enlarge the number of justices and he tried to change the slant of the justices. The corporate United States had to have one Supreme Court case which would support their bankruptcy
problem.

There was resistance to Roosevelt's court stacking efforts. Some of the justices tried to warn the Americans that Roosevelt was tampering with the law and with the courts. Roosevelt was trying to see to it that prior decisions of the court were overturned. He was trying to bring in a new order, a new procedure for the law of the land.


THE CORPORATE UNITED STATES GOES BANKRUPT

A bankruptcy case was needed on the books to legitimize the fact that the corporate U.S. had already declared bankruptcy! This bankruptcy was effectuated by compact that the corporate several states had with the corporate government (Corporate Capitol of the several corporate states). This compact tied the corporate several states to corporate Washington D.C, (the headquarters of the corporation called "The United States").

Since the United States Corporation, having established its headquarters within the District of Columbia, declared itself to be in the state of bankruptcy, it automatically declared bankruptcy for all its subsidiaries who were effectively connected corporate members (who happened to be the corporate state governments of the Union). The corporate state governments didn't have to vote on the bankruptcy. The bankruptcy automatically became effective by reason
of the Compact/Agreement between each of the corporate state governments and THE MOTHER CORPORATION. (Note: the liberty of using the term "Mother Corporation" to communicate the interconnected power of the corporate Federal government relative to her associated corporate States has been taken.

It is Historical knowledge that the original Union States created the Federal Government, however, for all practical purposes, the Federal government has taken control of her "Creators", the States.) She has become a beast out of control for power. She has for her trade names the following: "United States", "U.S.", "U.S.A.", "United States of America", Washington D.C., District of Columbia, Feds. and Federal Government. She has her own U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines,
Parks, Post Office etc. etc. etc. Because she is claiming to be bankrupt, she freely gives her land, her personnel, and the money she steals from the Americans via the IRS. and her state corporations, to the International Bankers as payment for her debt. The International Bankers use this money and services for various world wide projects, including war.

War is an extremely lucrative business for the bankers of the New World Order. Loans for destruction. Loans for re-construction. Loans for controlling people in her new world order.


THE U.S. INC. DECLARES BANKRUPTCY

The corporate U.S. then, is the head corporate member, who met at Geneva to decide for all its corporate body members. The corporate representatives of the corporate several states were in attendance. If the states had their own power to declare bankruptcy regardless of whether Washington D.C. declared bankruptcy or not, then the several states would have been represented at Geneva. The several states of America were not represented. Consequently, whatever Washington D.C. agreed to at Geneva was passed on automatically, via compact to the several corporate states as a group, association, corporation or as a
club member; they all agreed and declared bankruptcy as one government corporate group in 1930. The several states only needed a representative at Geneva by way of the U.S. in Washington D.C. The delegates of the corporate United States attended the meetings and spoke for the several corporate states as well as for the Federal Corporate Government. And, presto, BANKRUPTCY was declared for all!

From 1930 to 1938 the states could not enact any law or decide any case that would go against the Federal Government. The case had to come down from the Federal level so that the states could then rely on the Federal decision and use this decision within the states as justification for the bankruptcy process within the states.


UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE EMERGES AS LAW OF THE LAND
Ah, Ha, are you beginning to get the picture?

By 1938 the corporate Federal Government had the true bankruptcy case they had been looking for. Now, the bankruptcy that had been declared back in 1930 could be upheld and administered. That's why the Supreme Court had to be stacked and made corrupt from within. The new players on the Supreme Court fully understood that they had to destroy all other case law that had been established prior to 1938. The Federal Government had to have a case to destroy all precedence, all appearance, and even the statute of law itself. That is, the Statutes
at large had to be perverted. They finally got their case in Erie vs. Thompkins. It was right after that case that the American Law Institute and the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws listed right in the front of the Uniform Commercial Code, began creating the Uniform Commercial Code that is on the U.S. citizens backs today. Let us quote directly from the preface of the Official Text of the Uniform Commercial Code 12th Edition:

"The Code was originally approved by its sponsors and the American Bar Association in 1952, and was revised in 1958 to incorporate a number of changes that had been recommended by the New York Law Revision Commission and other agencies. Subsequent amendments that were deemed desirable in light of experience under the Code were approved by the Permanent Editorial Board in 1962 and 1966"

The above named groups and associations of private lawyers got together and started working on the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). It was somewhere between 1938 and 1940, I don't recall, but by the early 40's and during the war, this committee was working to form the UCC and getting it ready to go on the market. The UCC is the Law Merchant's code for the administration of the bankruptcy. The UCC is now the law of the land as far as the courts are concerned. This Legal Committee of lawyers put everything: Negotiable Instruments, Security, Sales, Contracts, and the whole mess under the UCC. That's where the "Uniform" word comes from. It means it was uniform from state to state as well as being uniform with the District of Columbia.

It doesn't mean you didn't have the uniform instrument laws on the books before this time. It means the laws were not uniform from state to state. By the middle 1960's, every state had passed the UCC into law. The states had no choice but to adopt newly formed Uniform Commercial Code as the Law of the Land. The states fully understood they had to administrate Bankruptcy. Washington D.C. adopted the Uniform Commercial Code in 1963, just six weeks after President John F. Kennedy was killed.


LAWYER'S SECRET OATH???

What was the effect and the significance of Erie vs. Thompkins case decision of 1938? The significance is that since the Erie Decision, no cases are allowed to be cited that are prior to 1938. There can be no mixing of the old law with the new law. The lawyers, who are members of the American Bar Association, were and are currently under and controlled by the Lawyer's guild of Great Britain, created,
formed, and implemented the new bankruptcy law. The American Bar Association is a franchise of the Lawyer's Guild of Great Britain.

Since the Erie vs. Thompkins case was decided, the practice of law in that country was never again to be the same. It has been reported, that every lawyer in existence, and every lawyer coming up has to take a "secret" oath to support bankruptcy. As Officers of the Court they have sworn to uphold the law as it exists, and as they have been taught. In so doing, not only do the lawyers promise to support the bankruptcy, but the lawyers and judges promise never to reveal who
the true creditor/party is in the bankruptcy proceedings (if, indeed, many of them are even aware or know). In court, there is never identification and appearance of the true character and principle of the proceedings. If there is no appearance of the true party to the action, then there is no way the defendant is able to know the TRUE NATURE AND CAUSE OF THE ACTION. You are never told the true NATURE
AND CAUSE OF WHY YOU ARE IN FRONT OF THEIR COURT. The court is forbidden to tell you that information.

That's why, if you question the true nature and cause, the judge will tell you "It's not my job to tell you. You are not retaining me as an attorney and I can't give you legal advice from the bench. I suggest you hire a lawyer."


HIRE A LAWYER?

The problem here is, if you hire a lawyer who is pledged not to reveal the true nature and the cause, how will you ever find out the nature and the cause? YOU WON'T! If the true nature and the cause of the action against you is revealed, it will expose the real creditor from whom this action and cause came. In other words, they will have to name the TRUE creditor. The true creditor will have to state the
nature and the cause. The true creditor will have to say "It's a bankruptcy proceeding." The true creditor will have to say, "I'm the creditor and he's the debtor."

That declaration would open the door for you to question "Who the hell are you? How did you get attached to my back and by what vehicle did I promise to become a debtor to you?" In the U.S., the courts on every level, from the justice of the peace level all the way up...... even into the International law arena, (called the World Court), are administrating the bankruptcy and are pledged not to
reveal who the true creditors really are and how you personally became pledged as a party or participant to the corporate United States debt. What would really kill these people off, would be to compel the International Bankers to send a lawyer into the courtroom and present himself as the attorney for THE TRUE CREDITOR, THE
INTERNATIONAL BANKERS. THEN, HAVE THE ATTORNEY PUT INTO THE RECORD THE TRUE NATURE AND CAUSE OF THE PROCEEDING AGAINST YOU ON THAT PARTICULAR DAY.

The International Bankers told these various countries that they were now in a state of bankruptcy. The countries had been taken over by the creditor/bankers. And there was no choice, but for all these participating countries to declare bankruptcy. If they didn't agree to declare bankruptcy, the bankers threatened to collapse the economies and thereby put the countries back into the depression like
the one from which they were just emerging. The bankers made an offer they couldn't refuse. To review and elaborate: In 1930 there was a world wide depression.

The Bankers said, "Look. You can do it either of two ways. The easy way or the hard way." "You just accept the bankruptcy and we'll let you out of the depression. If you don't, you're on your own." So all the countries involved agreed, because they realized that the International bankers had them by the throat. The countries therefore agreed that over a period of several years that they would pass
statutes and legislation for the implementation of the bankruptcy in favor of the international bankers.

Now, it would probably be correct to say that the key bankers were the Rothschild's and their agents by way of Rockefeller, by way of the Federal Reserve Bank. Who the bankers were is immaterial. The fact remains that there was an International bankruptcy, and an International conspiracy to cover it up. There was a banking creditor who made the offer; the countries accepted the offer in order to
enable the representative countries to continue without revolution and to allow the politicians to remain comfortably in place. Under a delusion of solvency the countries were allowed to continue to operate as though they were solvent; while in fact, the representative countries were bankrupt.


THE SNARE

The bankruptcy scheme was/is an extremely clever and diabolical plan. How did they possibly pull this scheme off in the area of real estate? The bankers did it with real estate, the same way they did it in the area of Federal Income Taxes. These Foreign bankers simply and deceptively devised ways and means to con you into declaring yourself as a "CITIZEN" or a "RESIDENT" of the corporate U.S. Remember the
corporate United States is Bankrupt per agreement and public policy. After you have been tricked into claiming you are one of their corporate United States Citizens, you are given a social security number which ties you to certain meager "benefits" and "privileges." Then, the bankers con your employer to function as
an unpaid tax collector to con you into filling out their W-4 intangible property gift forms and 1040 voluntary agreements.

These slick paper agreements establish your "voluntary" indebtedness to the banker creditor. If at any time you decide to balk at this scheme because you don't like it, the real creditor never has to make an appearance in court to list the true nature and cause of the action which is being brought against you. You end up dealing with an agency. The agency can conveniently grant itself immunity from prosecution because all it is doing (without your knowledge, of course) is administrating the bankruptcy to which the government agreed to per the Geneva meetings.

The court system never lets you put the original creditor on the courtroom stand, so you can ask him how he got attached to your back. The system is set up in such a way that the true creditor is protected and never has to make an appearance and never has to answer any of your questions or produce documents. Therefore, the true creditor never has to produce the law that gives him the right to pledge you (your body and labor) into indebtedness (bondage/servitude).

Why? Because the Geneva agreement in 1930 was done by treaty. The bankruptcy was not done by legislation. The agreement came first; signed in secrecy, THEN the U.S. Congress began to pass legislation to fulfill the bankruptcy obligation required by the treaty. Legislation being passed by Congress was henceforth and is thereby bankruptcy
legislation. When cases came before the courts, the courts could make decisions based on the new controlling law of bankruptcy. It had nothing to do with Constitutional rights. Now, any case brought in is under the new bankruptcy law and is not considered as a true constitutional case. It is now a bankrupty case as distinct from, but cleverly disguised as a constitutional case.


THE FRAUD

The members of the Supreme Court, of course, realized what was happening to them and the system of law. The court was being asked to perform in a creditor, debtor bankrupt proceeding to the benefit of the banker creditors. The members of the Supreme Court said, "NO. We will not give you a bankrupt proceeding decision that you can then enforce against everybody; a decision not only effecting corporate Washington D.C. but also having effect within the corporate state
governments."

This, by the way, is fraud. It wouldn't be fraud if the government of corporate Washington D.C. and the government of the several corporate states declared bankruptcy then let the people know about the bankruptcy. (Notice: when I say corporate "government" I don't mean the American people. Americans are not the corporate government. The corporate government is the corporate capital of the corporate state. The government is a neutral government zone known as the corporate capital of the corporate state. The government is where the corporate state is. It is corporate headquarters. Just like corporate Washington D.C. is the seat of the corporate Federal Government. The capital of the corporate state is the seat of the corporate state government. If the corporate Federal Government and her subsidiary corporate state governments want to join forces and declarebankruptcy that's not fraud. This is their corporate business.

However, it is fraud when those two corporate entities declare bankruptcy but do not disclose to every American, that they have so declared bankruptcy.

Further, they have not and do not disclose that their intention is to get every American in that country to pledge to pay off their corporate debt to their corporate creditors. The corporate bankruptcy is the corporate state and federal responsibility, not the responsibility of Americans, The People.


U.S. INC. IS DISTINCT AND SEPARATE FROM PRIVATE AMERICANS

"We the People" who created and signed the contract/compact/agreement/charter of, by, and for the Constitutional
Corporation (U.S.) using the trade name of the "United States of
America," is a corporate entity (legal fiction) which is DISTINCT AND
SEPARATE from Americans or the unenfranchised people of America. The
private natural American people did not create the corporation of the
United States. The United States Inc. did not create the private natural American people. America and Americans were in existence prior to the creation of the United States Corporation. The United States Corporation has located its U.S. headquarters in Washington D.C.

Virginia State (state territory) gave land to the newly formed United States Corporation. Notice here, we have a state giving something of value (land) to the United States. The United States Corporation agreed in the Constitutional contract, to protect the States. Instead, because of their bankruptcy (Corporate U.S. Bankruptcy) this particular U.S. corporation has enslaved the States and the people by deception and at the will of their foreign bankers with whom they have been doing business. Their forefathers gave their lives and property to prevent enslavement.

Today, Americans are again enslaved. Private natural American people have been tricked, deceived, and set-up to carry the U.S. Inc. perpetual corporate debt under bankruptcy laws. Every time Americans appear in court, the corporate U.S. bankruptcy is being administrated against them without their knowledge and lawful consent. That is FRAUD.

All corporate bankruptcy administration is done by "Public Policy" of by and for the Mother Corporation (U.S. Inc.).


THE MOTHER CORPORATION'S "PUBLIC POLICY"

The corporate bankruptcy is carried out under the corporate public policy of the corporate Federal Government in corporate Washington D.C. The states use state public policy to carry out Federal public policy of Washington D.C. Public policy and only public policy is being administered against Americans in the corporate courts today. The public policy that is dictated by all the courts, from the smallest
to the most powerful courts in the world, is public policy.
Corporate public policy is the crux of the whole bankruptcy implementation. Corporate public policy is forever a Corporate public policy and the laws that have passed since 1938 are all corporate public policy laws dealing only with corporate public policy. Understand that U.S. corporate public policy is not an American public policy. The public policy is OF, ( belonging to) the United States corporation. This U.S. corporate bankruptcy public policy is not OF (belonging to) America, the Republic.

The Erie vs. Thompkins 1938 case was a decision based upon public policy. All decisions at any level since 1938, have been public policy decisions. All statutes, rules, regulations, and procedures that have been passed, whether civil or criminal, whether it is Federal or State, have all been passed to implement the public policy of bankruptcy. Since 1933, when FDR came into office, he brought in
public policy. He established that it was the public policy of the government to call in all the gold. It was the public policy of the government to declare a banking holiday. It was the public policy of the Government in Washington D.C., (the Federal Government) to give out government assistance. Public policy operates the same within the states. All Federal court decisions can only be handed down if the states support Federal public policy. The state legal system must be compatible with the Federal legal system.


THE MONKEY-WRENCH

This is why, when people go to court without being represented by a lawyer, they throw a monkey-wrench into the corporate administrative proceedings. Why? Because all public policy corporate lawyers are pledged to up-hold public policy, which is the corporate U.S. administration of their corporate bankruptcy. That's why you'll find stamped on many if not all U.S. briefs, "THIS CASE IS NOT TO BE CITED IN ANY OTHER CASE AND IS NOT TO BE REPORTED IN ANY COURTS." The reason for this notation is that when they go in to defend themselves or file a claim they are not supporting the corporate bankruptcy administration and procedure. The arguments they put forth predate 1938.

They come in with Constitutional law etc. All these early cases support their rights not to be in bankruptcy. However, the corporate court, lawyers, and judges have promised to give no judicial recognition of any case before 1938.


THE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS'
CORPORATE PLANTATION
U.S.A. STYLE

Before 1938, the law was not a public policy law. All these old cases
were not public law deciding cases. Today, the cases are all decided
under corporate public policy. The public policy exists in order to
administer the bankruptcy for the benefit of the banker creditors and
to protect the banker creditor.

Corporate public policy can allow the creditor to say to the
corporate legislatures, "I want a law passed requiring my debtors to
wear seat belts. Why? Because I want to be able to milk my debtors
for the longest period possible."

It doesn't behoove the creditor to allow all of his labor producing
debtors die at an average age 30 years. What would happen to the
bankers' lending, interest, penalties, increase, repayment etc., on
the entire funding and lending process if the average American life
span was only 30 years? Why, the bankers would have to have 2 1/2
times the current consumer population to equal their current take.
The bankers would need (instead of 250 million Americans) 600 million
or even more. Maybe the bankers would need 2 Billion Americans
because the individual can't contract for debt until he/she is 18 or
21 years of age. Therefore, if the average life span is only a 30
year period, the creditor could collect on the debt for only 12
years.

Now, if the bankers can just get people to live an average of 70
years) you are talking a whopping 50 years of indebtedness for which
they contract and for which they are forced to pay back with
usury/interest. With this situation, the banker creditor can now
float loans worth 50 years of potential indebtedness and its payoff
with interest in the name of the people, as opposed to 9 to 12 years.

The creditors and their property and their people are well taken care
of. The creditor doesn't want the population to decrease per se,
unless, it is convenient for the debtor to run up debts in another's
name and then liquidate that debtor or that group of debtor people.
For example let's consider the AIDS problem today among the black
people. What better group to inject AIDS into than the black people?

Read the Strecker Memorandum on AIDS and the World Health
Organization connection. This documents their tainted vaccination
program in Africa and elsewhere. Why not kill them off? Don't you
understand that the blacks as a whole have absorbed all the debt that
they can? The blacks have reached the maximum of the debt that they
can carry. In fact, they have gone over their limit to pay back. They
are now heavily into welfare, public housing, medicaid, medicare,
food stamps etc.. Now, the situation is that instead of paying off
the creditor, they have become a drain on the creditor. The creditor
must now pay them to live and take care of them. What creditor in his
right mind wants to spend money on a bunch of people from whom he
can't collect any revenue?

The corporate public policy of the corporate United States and the
states and the county and of the cities are that YOU must take care
of these people. You must provide them with welfare etc. Why? Because
when you, as a member of the corporate body politic allow laws to be
passed which says the minorities must be taken care of, then the
corporate legislature can say the public policy is that the people
want these people taken care of. Therefore, when given the chance,
the legislature can say the public policy is that the people want
these blacks and poor whites to be taken care of and given a chance,
therefore, we must raise taxes to fund all these benefits, privileges
and opportunities.

This is what these people need to make them socially, politically,
and economically equal with everyone else. The legislatures have
passed all kinds of statutes providing for huge indebtedness and they
float the indebtedness off your backs because you have never gone
into court to challenge them by telling them it is not your public
policy to assume the debts of other people. On the contrary, all the
court decisions coming put, indicate it is the corporate public
policy and it is your willingness to support the corporate public
policy to pay off these debts.

Remember, "public" means of and for the corporate Government. It does
not mean of and for private people. "Public" means corporate
government. It is corporate government policy. When they talk about
public debt, they are talking about corporate government debt and
your presumed pledge against this corporate created debt.


THE REAL ESTATE SNARE

How do they work this scheme in the area of real estate? These banker
creeps have made an agreement that it is corporate public policy,
that all land (property) be pledged to the creditor to satisfy the
debt of the bankruptcy, which the creditor claims under bankruptcy.
They get away with this the same way they get away with any other
case that is brought before the court, whether it is a traffic
ticket, IRS, or whatever.

Here is how it works. Americans have signed instruments giving information and jurisdiction to the bankers through their agents. The instruments (forms) they signed include, but are not limited to the following:
social security registration, use of the social security number, IRS
forms, driver license, traffic citation, jury duty, voter
registration, using their address, zip code, U.S. postal service, a
deed, a mortgage application, etc. etc. The bankers then use that
instrument (document) under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) as a
contract/agreement. These documents are considered promissory
contract where Americans promise to perform. This scheme involves them,
without ever becoming directly in contact or in contract with the
true creditor. What's more, they are never informed as to whom that
true creditor is and it is never divulged to them the true nature and
the true cause of the paperwork that they are filling out.

If they examine their real estate deed, they will find that they
promised to pay taxes to the corporate government. On property they
originally acquired through a mortgage, they will notice that the bank
never promised to pay taxes. they did. The corporate government at all
levels never promised to pay taxes to the creditor. Americans did.

In tax and collection problems relating to real estate being enforced
against Americans, they will notice that there is no mention in the mortgage or the deed stating the true nature and cause of the action. Since they have made the promise to perform, they get a bill every year for property taxes. They don't realize that the only way they can bill Americans for taxes is through their own stupidity of agreeing to pay the tax. They volunteered. They took advantage of Americans, conning them to promise to pay properly taxes. When they send citizens their bill, they are coming against citizens for the collection of the promise they made to the creditor.

Now the creditor on the paperwork appears that it is the local bank.
The bank has loaned them credit. The bank hasn't loaned them anything.
It is not their credit to loan. This is why the bank can't loan
credit. There is a credit involved, but not the bank's credit. It is
the credit of the International Bankers. The International bankers
are making them the loan based upon their operation of bankruptcy
claim which they presume to have against American citizens personally as well as their property. Now, let's say Americans get a tax bill and they decide "I'm not going to pay it." They will find that the courts and the lawyers and the county agencies are set up to protect the true creditor simply by not identifying the creditor. By not being identified as the true creditor, the international banker can make Americans a credit loan that has no value in reality.

In the case of real property, they claim to loan Americans the use of their own property for which they pay a tax as rent. They are allowed to do this because Americans are presumed by statutory law and the banker to be in bankruptcy. This fraud is not revealed because they do not have to make an appearance in court to present and defend their claim. Their name is not mentioned in the case.

Let's say Americans are not aware of their remedies provided for them within the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). The UCC provides or allows Americans to dishonor the county's presentment of the tax bill. They don't pay their
tax bill. They, therefore, just sit on it and don't do or say
anything. A couple of years go by and all of a sudden they are being
sent letters to pay up what is owed or else in a certain period of
time, the property will be taken from them and put up for tax sale.

Now here is what is interesting........ If they don't pay their tax
bill and are contacted, asking them to pay it and they don't do it,
it will be declared that they are in default. It is based on that
default, as provided for in the UCC, that they sell citizens property for the tax (rent).

However, the county never goes into court to put into the record the
identification of the real creditor. And the county does not state
the true nature and cause of the action against Americans (bankruptcy
action disguised as a tax action). Why? Because, under bankruptcy
implementation, they have developed a legal procedure which is based
upon citizens promise to pay. This procedure provides that they don't
have to come to the court to get a court order authorizing the sale
of citizens property. Therefore, the real creditor never makes an
appearance in court.

The reality is, Americans are denied any possibility of appearing in court to exercise their right to challenge the creditor. To ask if he became the creditor under "public policy." To ask if it is under "public policy", just what is the "public policy?" And how did you (as an international banker) become "creditor" to me and everyone else in
this country (American people). They don't want you to ask the real
creditor (the International Bankers), to produce the documents upon
which your personal debt is established. If they were forced to go
into court, they would have to produce the deed or mortgage showing
you knowingly, willingly, and voluntarily promised to pay the
corporate public debt. You did not knowingly, willingly, and
voluntarily promise to pay any U.S. Corporate Bankruptcy obligation
made in the 1930's.

This would, of course, expose their racket. The fact is, that, there
was absolutely no debt connected to Americans until they agreed to it
through their deception and fraud. The deception in a broader sense,
permeates the education system and the news media, etc., to sell Americans on the idea that they are a statutory "U.S. citizen" and "resident of the United States." (INCORPORATED).


YOUR SIGNATURE IS YOUR MOST VALUABLE PROPERTY

Your property is pledged for the rest of your life upon your
signature and your promise to perform is pledged into perpetual debt.
The bankers don't even bother to go to court They leave it up to the
agencies to administer the agency corporate public policy. It is the
public policy of that agency to bill you on your promise to perform.
If you don't pay, they follow up on the public policy on notice of
default and give you one more chance to pay. Then they proceed to
sell the property at a tax auction. They never go to court or appear
in court to back up their claim against you. Did any of your
government licensed and controlled teachers ever stress that your
signature is your most valuable personal property? Did your
government teachers ever tell you that any time you sign any
document, you should sign it "without prejudice," or with "All Rights
Reserved" above your signature. This means you are reserving your God
given unalienable rights which cannot be transferred and all other
rights for which your forefathers died.

The Corporate U.S.. Government provides, or at best pretends to
provide for this reservation of rights under the Uniform Commercial
Code (UCC) 1-207 and 1-103. You need more information in this area.
It is not in the best interest of the United States Corporate "PUBLIC" schools to teach you about their bankruptcy proceedings and how they have set the snare to Compel you into paying their debt. The Corporate "PUBLIC" schools are strictly designed for their Corporate citizen/subjects. That is. the Corporate U.S.. Public School citizens.

Notice all the emphases on being a "good" Citizen. Basically all
their teachers and their students are trained to produce labor and
material in exchange for valueless green paper called "money." It is
not money, it functions "AS" money. Lawful money must be backed by
something of value. Bankers take your labor, services, and material
(homes, cars, farms, etc.) in exchange for their valueless corporate
paper. This paper is backed only by the "full faith and Confidence of
the United States Government" THE MOTHER CORPORATION.

I do not have faith or confidence in the U.S. BANKRUPT CORPORATE
GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATORS WHO HAVE PERVERTED THEIR Constitutional
CHARTER, enslaving the sovereign American people into their
bankruptcy obligations. Their fraudulent money laundering process
promotes citizens payment on the corporate government's bankruptcy debt. This debt is mathematically impossible to pay Off. Americans and their families are in continual financial bondage to the international
bankers. They love it so!

Black's Law Dictionary 1990, defines "Money Changers"
as: .....business of a banker... today handled by the international
departments of banks." Let me think for a moment, what did Christ do
to the Money Changers." Oh, Yes, he severely interfered with their
activity. Three days later he was crucified. Lincoln was killed for
interfering with the money changers. Kennedy was slaughtered for
interfering with the money changers.

Let's return to the subject of your property, and the tax sale for
not paying property taxes. In this situation under a standard deed
(not common law deed) you are actually in default. Not because you
understand the default or you like being in default, you just are in
default of the tax payment. So they put your property up for sale. At
the tax sale, Joe Doe, average American, bids on your property and
gets it. Now, there is a procedure he must go through step by step to
establish. He is required to give you another chance. You have six
months and a day to pay off the default. If, at this time, you pay
off the amount the county says you owe, plus penalties, interest,
fines, etc., then your property is taken off default status and it is
yours to continue to pay taxes on the next year.


THE COVER-UP

There was a deal struck that, if any person who doesn't have a lawyer
to bring a case before the courts, and this person proves the fraud,
and speaks the truth about the fraud, the courts are compelled to not
allow the case to be cited or published anywhere. The courts cannot
afford to have the case freely available in the public archives. This
would be evidence of the fraud. That is why you can't hire an
attorney. An attorney is compelled to uphold the fraud.


"TRUST ME"
"I'm Here To Help You."
"I Have The Governments Permission To Practice Law."
"I'm A Member of the Bar."

The attorney is there for one reason. That reason is to make sure the
bankruptcy scam (established by the corporate public policy of the
corporate Federal Government) is upheld. The lawyer's will cite no
cases for you that will go against the bankruptcy in corporate public
policy. Whatever the lawyers do for you is a bunch of Bull Shit. The
lawyers have to support the bankruptcy and public policy even at your
expense. The lawyers can't go against the corporate Federal
Government statutes implementing, protecting and administrating the
bankruptcy.

For all cases cited, those in the US Code or the state annotated code
or any other source, you may be sure that they are only those
selected cases that support the public policy of bankruptcy. The
legal system has to work that way. After the last 30-40-50-60 years
of cases after cases having been decided based upon upholding the
bankruptcy, how could the legal system possibly allow someone to come
into court and put in the record substantial information and argument
to prove the fraud?


BLOOD IN THE STREETS?

Can you imagine how damaging it would be, if they allowed your case
to be cited in another case, or if they allowed the public to examine
a copy of your brief that exposes evidence of the fraud? This
exposure would render null and void everything for which they have
worked so hard. Wouldn't this exposure make the people mad? Wouldn't
this exposure mean there would be blood running in the streets?
Especially the cities where the poor people have been really taken by
this diabolical system. What they are concerned about is that the
case never be cited. That goes against the bankruptcy for fear of
exposing the bankruptcy and the people will then pick up their guns
and shoot the SOB's.

THE LAWYERS GUILD CONNECTION

Here is what happens. The American Bar Association is a franchise of
the Lawyers Guild of Great Britain. The American Bar Association is
not connected primarily with what happens in any case on the local
level. However, when a case leaves the local level, by that is meant,
the state court, city court or the justice of the peace, or even the
federal court; and goes to the appeal's court, it would appear that
the American Bar Association takes notice of the case. It would seem
that the American Bar Association must have an agreement that any
action brought on appeal, must be reviewed by the American Bar
Association. If this is true, it would make sense. How else would the
American Bar Association, a branch of the Lawyers Guild of Great
Britain, which is the legal arm of the Rothschild's Dynasty, be able
to monitor and administer the corporate bankruptcy. It would appear
that the American Bar Association would be compelled to review all
appeal cases and to make certain any case brought under common law or
the constitutional law that would expose the bankruptcy, would be
immediately stamped on the back that "this case is not to be cited or
published." I believe that this is the stamp origin and purpose of
the stamp message in such cases. The justice department may be able
to do that in Washington D.C.. I can't see where any judge or lawyer
could have the authority to stamp or label the case as one not to be
cited for future cases. I think that is an official stamp from the
American Bar Association.


THE BANKRUPTCY ACCOUNTING SYSTEM

Now, Mr/Ms. Law Student, if you're still attending classes and you
have a good professor, ask him/her about just where the stamp comes
from that you've seen on many cases. Just who put it on the paperwork
and just who authorized the citation restriction. Just who is
tampering with the law. There is one thing certain the creditor and
or his agents are watching these cases very carefully. The creditor
and his agents must balance their books. When you think of the IRS,
be aware that the IRS is an agent of the creditor, the corporate
International Bankers. This is just one of the Bankers' state side
agencies. The General Accounting Office (GAO) is another agency they
use for this country.

This is where all the accounting goes on to keep track of the debt.
All the states have to send reports to Washington D.C. Washington
D.C. has to send reports to the (GAO). Take a look at your state
Comptroller's Annual Report to the Governor of your state. I found it
in the library located in the city of the corporate state capital.
Look under "Trust Fund" for each state sub-corporation like the state
courts, IRS, Banks, Education, etc. you will be amazed at the amount
of money being pumped into the Trust Fund from the various Corporate
State Departmental Revenues (all revenue is referred to as taxes:
fines, fees, licenses, etc.). There are millions and billions of your
hard earned worthless federal reserve notes, "dollars", being held
in "trust."This money is being siphoned off into the coffers of the
International Bankers while the corporate government officials are
hounding you for more and more tax dollars.

All this accounting system is NOT so the people will know what is
going on. The accounting reports are for the bankers and creditors to
keep tabs on just where their collections are coming from. The
bankers want to know if the bankruptcy debt payments are coming in
and just how much and from what sources. This accounting is the
purpose behind M1, M2, M3, M4. and M5. All this accounting is closely
monitored. Maybe every day, but at least once a week. These M's are
the reports of the amounts of money in circulation. The amount of
debt out there, and the amount of credit out there. The floating of
debt in the form of bonds. There are five different categories. This
system had to come into existence in order for the creditors to be on
top of the bankruptcy at all times. This system allows the creditors
to figure out and know exactly what is going on in their domain.

It all makes sense. Don't the bankers hire bill collectors? Creditors
hire bill collectors to snoop around do see why you're not paying.
They want do know how much you are going to pay so they can figure
out how much will be coming in. How much they will collect. They want
to know who will pay and who won't.


THE WHOLE SYSTEM IS NOTHING BUT CREDIT AND DEBT.

THE WORLD CREDIT UNION

Here is what is going to very quickly happen internationally. All of
the governments around the world are going to unite. They will create
one big giant credit union for collecting the debt for the
International Bankers. We have allowed ourselves do get into this
very sad situation, but THAT IS THE WAY IT IS.



WELCOME TO YOUR NEW WORLD ORDER

THE TRUTH ABOUT "ROBIN HOOD"

THE TRUTH ABOUT "ROBIN HOOD"
THE SECRET FINANCIAL NETWORK BEHIND "WIZARD" GEORGE SOROS
by William Engdahl

EIR Investigation Executive Intelligence Review (EIR), November 1, 1996
The dossier that follows is based upon a report released on Oct. 1 by EIR's bureau in Wiesbaden, Germany, titled "A Profile of Mega-Speculator George Soros." Research was contributed by Mark Burdman, Elisabeth Hellenbroich, Paolo Raimondi, and Scott Thompson.

Time magazine has characterized financier George Soros as a "modern-day Robin Hood," who robs from the rich to give to the poor countries of eastern Europe and Russia.

It claimed that Soros makes huge financial gains by speculating against western central banks, in order to use his profits to help the emerging post-communist economies of Eastern Europe and former Soviet Union, to assist them to create what he calls an "Open Society."

The Time statement is entirely accurate in the first part, and entirely inaccurate in the second. He robs from rich western countries, and uses his profits to rob even more savagely from the East, under the cloak of "philanthropy." His goal is to loot wherever and however he can. Soros has been called the master manipulator of "hit-and-run capitalism."

As we shall see, what Soros means by "open," is a society that allows him and his financial predator friends to loot the resources and precious assets of former Warsaw Pact economies. By bringing people like Jeffrey Sachs or Sweden's Anders Aslund and their economic shock therapy into these economies, Soros lays the groundwork for buying up the assets of whole regions of the world at dirt-cheap prices.

The man who broke the Bank of England?

An examination of Soros' secretive financial network is vital to understand the true dimension of the "Soros problem" in Eastern Europe and other nations.

Following the crisis of the European Exchange Rate Mechanism of September 1992, when the Bank of England was forced to abandon efforts to stabilize the pound sterling, a little-known financial figure emerged from the shadows, to boast that he had personally made over $1 billion in speculation against the British pound. The speculator was the Hungarian-born George Soros, who spent the war in Hungary under false papers working for the Nazi government, identifying and expropriating the property of wealthy fellow Jews. Soros left Hungary after the war, and established American citizenship after some years in London. Today, Soros is based in New York, but that tells little, if anything, of who and what he is.

Following his impressive claims to possession of a "Midas touch," Soros has let his name be publicly used in a blatant attempt to influence world financial markets---an out-of-character act for most financial investors, who prefer to take advantage of situations not yet discovered by rivals, and keep them secret. Soros the financier is as much a political animal, as a financial speculator.

Soros proclaimed in March 1993, with great publicity, that the price of gold was about to rise sharply; he said that he had just gotten "inside information" that China was about to buy huge sums of gold for its booming economy. Soros was able to trigger a rush into buying gold, which caused prices to rise more than 20% over four months, to the highest level since 1991. Typically for Soros, once the fools rushed in to push prices higher, Soros and his friend Sir James Goldsmith secretly began selling their gold at a huge profit.

Then, in early June 1993, Soros proclaimed his intent to force a sell-off in German government bonds in favor of the French, in an open letter to London Times Financial Editor Anatole Kaletsky, in which Soros proclaimed, "Down with the D-Mark!" Soros has at various times attacked the currencies of Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Mexico, coming into newly opened financial markets which have little experience with foreign investors, let alone ones with large funds like Soros. Soros begins buying stocks or bonds in the local market, leading others to naively suppose that he knows something they do not. As with gold, when the smaller investors begin to follow Soros, driving prices of stocks or whatever higher, Soros begins to sell to the eager new buyers, cashing in his 40% or 100% profits, then exiting the market, and often, the entire country, to seek another target for his speculation. This technique gave rise to the term "hit and run."

What Soros always leaves behind, is a collapsed local market and financial ruin of national investors.

The secret of the Quantum Fund NV

Soros is the visible side of a vast and nasty secret network of private financial interests, controlled by the leading aristocratic and royal families of Europe, centered in the British House of Windsor. This network, called by its members the Club of Isles, was built upon the wreckage of the British Empire after World War II.

Rather than use the powers of the state to achieve their geopolitical goals, a secret cross-linked holding of private financial interests, tied to the old aristocratic oligarchy of western Europe, was developed. It was in many ways modeled on the 17th-century British and Dutch East India Companies. The heart of this Club of the Isles is the financial center of the old British Empire, the City of London. Soros is one of what in medieval days were called Hofjuden, the "Court Jews," who were deployed by the aristocratic families.

The most important of such "Jews who are not Jews," are the Rothschilds, who launched Soros's career. They are members of the Club of the Isles and retainers of the British royal family. This has been true since Amschel Rothschild sold the British Hessian troops to fight against George Washington during the American Revolution.

Soros is American only in his passport. He is a global financial operator, who happens to be in New York, simply because "that's where the money is," as the bank robber Willy Sutton once quipped, when asked why he always robbed banks. Soros speculates in world financial markets through his offshore company, Quantum Fund NV, a private investment fund, or "hedge fund." His hedge fund reportedly manages some $11-14 billion of funds on behalf of its clients, or investors---one of the most prominent of whom is, according to Soros, Britain's Queen Elizabeth, the wealthiest person in Europe.

The Quantum Fund is registered in the tax haven of the Netherlands Antilles, in the Caribbean. This is to avoid paying taxes, as well as to hide the true nature of his investors and what he does with their money.

In order to avoid U.S. government supervision of his financial activities, something normal U.S.-based investment funds must by law agree to in order to operate, Soros moved his legal headquarters to the Caribbean tax haven of Curacao. The Netherlands Antilles has repeatedly been cited by the Task Force on Money Laundering of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) as one of the world's most important centers for laundering illegal proceeds of the Latin American cocaine and other drug traffic. It is a possession of the Netherlands.

Soros has taken care that none of the 99 individual investors who participate in his various funds are American nationals. By U.S. securities law, a hedge fund is limited to no more than 99 highly wealthy individuals, so-called "sophisticated investors." By structuring his investment company as an offshore hedge fund, Soros avoids public scrutiny.

Soros himself is not even on the board of Quantum Fund. Instead, for legal reasons, he serves the Quantum Fund as official "investment adviser," through another company, Soros Fund Management, of New York City. If any demand were to be made of Soros to reveal the details of Quantum Fund's operations, he is able to claim he is "merely its investment adviser." Any competent police investigator looking at the complex legal structure of Soros's businesses would conclude that there is prima facie evidence of either vast money laundering of illicit funds, or massive illegal tax evasion. Both may be true.

To make it impossible for U.S. tax authorities or other officials to look into the financial dealings of his web of businesses, the board of directors of Quantum Fund NV also includes no American citizens. His directors are Swiss, Italian, and British financiers.

George Soros is part of a tightly knit financial mafia---"mafia," in the sense of a closed masonic-like fraternity of families pursuing common aims. Anyone who dares to criticize Soros or any of his associates, is immediately hit with the charge of being "anti-Semitic"----a criticism which often silences or intimidates genuine critics of Soros's unscrupulous operations. The Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith considers it a top priority to "protect" Soros from the charges of "anti-Semites" in Hungary and elsewhere in Central Europe, according to ADL National Director Abraham Foxman. The ADL's record of service to the British oligarchy has been amply documented by EIR (e.g. The Ugly Truth About the Anti-Defamation League [Washington, D.C., Executive Intelligence Review: 1992]).

According to knowledgeable U.S. and European investigators, Soros's circle includes indicted metals and commodity speculator and fugitive Marc Rich of Zug, Switzerland and Tel Aviv; secretive Israeli arms and commodity dealer Shaul Eisenberg, and "Dirty Rafi" Eytan, both linked to the financial side of the Israeli Mossad; and, the family of Jacob Lord Rothschild.

Understandably, Soros and the Rothschild interests prefer to keep their connection hidden far from public view, so as to obscure the well-connected friends Soros enjoys in the City of London, the British Foreign Office, Israel, and the U.S. financial establishment. The myth, therefore, has been created, that Soros is a lone financial investment "genius" who, through his sheer personal brilliance in detecting shifts in markets, has become one of the world's most successful speculators. According to those who have done business with him, Soros never makes a major investment move without sensitive insider information.

On the board of directors of Soros's Quantum Fund N.V. is Richard Katz, a Rothschild man who is also on the board of the London N.M. Rothschild and Sons merchant bank, and the head of Rothschild Italia S.p.A. of Milan. Another Rothschild family link to Soros's Quantum Fund is Quantum board member Nils O. Taube, the partner of the London investment group St. James Place Capital, whose major partner is Lord Rothschild. London Times columnist Lord William Rees-Mogg is also on the board of Rothschild's St. James Place Capital.

A frequent business partner of Soros in various speculative deals, including in the 1993 gold manipulation, although not on the Quantum Fund directly, is the Anglo-French speculator Sir James Goldsmith, a cousin of the Rothschild family.

From the very first days when Soros created his own investment fund in 1969, he owed his success to his relation to the Rothschild family banking network. Soros worked in New York in the 1960s for a small private bank close to the Rothschilds, Arnhold & S. Bleichroeder, Inc., a banking family which represented Rothschild interests in Germany during Bismarck's time. To this day, A. & S. Bleichroeder, Inc. remains the Principal Custodian, along with Citibank, of funds of Soros's Quantum Fund. George C. Karlweiss, of Edmond de Rothschild's Switzerland-based Banque Privee SA in Lugano, as well as of the scandal-tainted Rothschild Bank AG of Zurich, gave Soros financial backing. Karlweiss provided some of the vital initial capital and investors for Soros's Quantum Fund.

Union Banque Privee and the 'Swiss connection'

Another member of the board of Soros's Quantum Fund is the head of one of the most controversial Swiss private banks, Edgar de Picciotto, who has been called "one of the cleverest bankers in Geneva"---and is one of the most scandal-tainted. De Picciotto, from an old Portuguese Jewish trading family, who was born in Lebanon, is head of the Geneva private bank CBI-TDB Union Bancaire Privee, a major player in the gold and offshore hedge funds business. Hedge funds have been identified by international police agencies as the fastest-growing outlet for illegal money laundering today.

De Picciotto is a longtime friend and business associate of banker Edmond Safra, also born in Lebanon, whose family came from Aleppo, Syria, and who now controls the Republic Bank of New York. Republic Bank has been identified in U.S. investigations into Russian organized crime, as the bank involved in transferring billions of U.S. Federal Reserve notes from New York to organized crime-controlled Moscow banks, on behalf of Russian organized crime figures. Safra is under investigation by U.S. and Swiss authorities for laundering Turkish and Columbian drug money.

In 1990, Safra's Trade Development Bank (TDB) of Geneva was merged with de Picciotto's CBI to create the CBI-TDB Union Banque Privee. The details of the merger are shrouded in secrecy to this day. As part of the deal, de Picciotto became a board member of American Express Bank (Switzerland) SA of Geneva, and two American Express Bank of New York executives sit on the board of de Picciotto's Union Banque Privee. Safra had sold his Trade Development Bank to American Express, Inc. in the 1980s. Henry Kissinger sits on the board of American Express, Inc., which has repeatedly been implicated in international money-laundering scandals.

De Picciotto's start as a Geneva banker came from Nicholas Baring of the London Barings Bank, who tapped de Picciotto to run the bank's secret Swiss bank business. Barings has for centuries been private banker to the British royal family, and since the bank's collapse in March 1995, has been overhauled by the Dutch ING Bank, which is reported to be a major money-laundering institution.

De Picciotto is also a longtime business partner of Venetian businessman Carlo De Benedetti, who recently was forced to resign as head of Olivetti Corp. Both persons sit on the board of the Societe Financiere de Geneve investment holding company in Geneva. De Benedetti is under investigation in Italy for suspicion of triggering the collapse of Italy's Banco Ambrosiano in the early 1980s. The head of that bank, Roberto Calvi, was later found hanging from the London Blackfriar's Bridge, in what police believe was a masonic ritual murder.

De Picciotto and his Union Banque Privee have been implicated in numerous drug and illegal money-laundering operations. In November 1994, U.S. federal agents arrested a senior official of de Picciotto's Geneva bank, Jean-Jacques Handali, along with two other UBP officials, on charges of leading a multimillion-dollar drug-money-laundering ring. According to the U.S. Attorney's Office in Miami, Handali and Union Banque Privee were the "Swiss connection" in an international drug-money-laundering ring tied to Colombian and Turkish cocaine and heroin organizations. A close business and political associate of de Picciotto is a mysterious arm dealer, Helmut Raiser, who is linked in business dealings with reputed Russian organized crime kingpin Grigori Luchansky, who controls the Russian and Swiss holding company Nordex Group.

Another director of Soros's Quantum Fund is Isodoro Albertini, owner of the Milan stock brokerage firm Albertini and Co. Beat Notz of the Geneva Banque Worms is another private banker on the board of Soros's Quantum Fund, as is Alberto Foglia, who is chief of the Lugano, Switzerland Banca del Ceresio. Lugano, just across the Swiss border from Milan, is notorious as the financial secret bank haven for Italian organized crime families, including the heroin mafia behind the 1980s "Pizza Connection" case. The Banca del Ceresio has been one of the secret Swiss banks identified in the recent Italian political corruption scandals as the repository of bribe funds of several Italian politicians now in prison.

The sponsorship of the Rothschilds

Soros's relation to the Rothschild finance circle represents no ordinary or casual banking connection. It goes a long way to explain the extraordinary success of a mere private speculator, and Soros's uncanny ability to "gamble right" so many times in such high-risk markets. Soros has access to the "insider track" in some of the most important government and private channels in the world.

Since World War II, the Rothschild family, at the heart of the financial apparatus of the Club of the Isles, has gone to great lengths to create a public myth about its own insignificance. The family has spent significant sums cultivating a public image as a family of wealthy, but quiet, "gentlemen," some of whom prefer to cultivate fine French wines, some of whom are devoted to charity.

Since British Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour wrote his famous November 1917 letter to Lord Rothschild, expressing official British government backing for establishment of a Palestinian national home for the Jewish people, the Rothschilds were intimately involved in the creation of Israel. But behind their public facade of a family donating money for projects such as planting trees in the deserts of Israel, N.M. Rothschild of London is at the center of various intelligence operations, and more than once has been linked to the more unsavory elements of international organized crime. The family prefers to keep such links at arm's length, and away from its London headquarters, via its lesser-known outposts such as their Zurich Rothschild Bank AG and Rothschild Italia of Milan, the bank of Soros partner Richard Katz.

N.M. Rothschild is considered by City of London sources to be one of the most influential parts of the British intelligence establishment, tied to the Thatcher "free market" wing of the Tory Party. Rothschild and Sons made huge sums managing for Thatcher the privatization of billions of dollars of British state industry holdings during the 1980s, and later, for John Major's government. Rothschilds is also at the very heart of the world gold trade, being the bank at which twice daily the London Gold Fix is struck by a group of the five most influential gold trade banks. Gold constitutes a major part of the economy of drug dealings globally.

N.M. Rothschild and Sons is also implicated in some of the filthiest drugs-for-weapons secret intelligence operations. Because it is connected to the highest levels of the British intelligence establishment, Rothschilds managed to evade any prominent mention of its complicity in one of the more sordid black covert intelligence networks, that of the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI). Rothschilds was at the center of the international web of money-laundering banks used during the 1970s and 1980s by Britain's MI-6 and the networks of Col. Oliver North and George Bush, to finance such projects as the Nicaraguan Contras.

On June 8, 1993 the chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives' Committee on Banking, Rep. Henry Gonzalez (D-Tex.), made a speech charging that the U.S. government, under the previous Bush and Reagan administrations, had systematically refused to prosecute the BCCI, and that the Department of Justice had repeatedly refused to cooperate with Congressional investigations of both the BCCI scandal and what Gonzalez claims is the closely related scandal of the Atlanta, Georgia Banca Nationale del Lavoro, which was alleged to have secured billions in loans from the Bush administration to Saddam Hussein, just prior to the Gulf War of 1990-91.

Gonzalez charged that the Bush administration had "a Justice Department that I say, and I repeat, has been the most corrupt, most unbelievably corrupt justice system that I have seen in the 32 years I have been in the Congress."

The BCCI violated countless laws, including laundering drug money, financing illegal arms traffic, and falsifying bank records. In July 1991, New York District Attorney Robert Morgenthau announced a grand jury indictment against BCCI, charging it with having committed "the largest bank fraud in world financial history. BCCI operated as a corrupt criminal organization throughout its entire 19-year history."

The BCCI had links directly into the Bush White House. Saudi Sheik Kamal Adham, a BCCI director and former head of Saudi Arabian intelligence when George Bush was head of the CIA, was one of the BCCI shareholders indicted in the United States. Days after his indictment, former top Bush White House aide Edward Rogers went to Saudi Arabia as a private citizen to sign a contract to represent Sheikh Adham in the United States.

Tillbaka till huvudsidan
http://www.nysol.se/stoppaknarket/soroseng.html