The New World Order

The goal of the New World Order is not one world government, as some still mistakenly believe. One world government would mean some visible responsibility. People would know where to put the blame. This is clearly not in the interest of those directing affairs. They want the power without the responsibility, and this does imply a certain amount of chaos, which must be created. This is at the heart of the whole concept, and if you do not clearly understand this, you will not understand what the New World Order is about.
The aim is to create a feudal world system. Instead of the medieval tribes, we have now entire nations, or entire regions of the globe. At the top, there is the United States. The goal of U.S. foreign policy is to effectively rule the world, using the carrot or, more often, the stick, without taking any responsibility for anything that happens anywhere, including those actions that obviously happen at U.S. behest.
Is it necessary to spell out where the rest of the world comes in? You have to put the toxic waste somewhere, and you have to keep the slaves somewhere. What would an aristocracy be without peasants reduced to despondence, misery, and starvation? You did not really think the aim of the New World Order was to make everybody comfortable, did you? Come on, there are limits to stupidity. Today more people die from starvation every year than were murdered by Hitler during the entire Second World War. Compared to the New World Order, that man played at the Beginner level.

It is also amusing how often these days, in an effort to implement the doctrine of New World Order, we hear Bush and his cronies tell us that 'the war against terrorism is not a war against Islam'. Whom do they think they are fooling? On the other hand, is this ominous phrase perhaps not a denial of what is obvious? Did we, perhaps, not yet understand the real meaning of this slogan? Do they mean, perhaps, "This is not a war against Islam? We are killing them just for fun." Alternatively, perhaps: "This is not a war against Islam. This is a war against everybody."
The latter interpretation sounds reassuringly correct. After all, the genocidal American campaign in Vietnam was not a war against Islam. The invasion of Grenada was not a war against Islam. The bombing of Panama City was not a war against Islam. The CIA creation, training, and equipment of death squads all over Latin America were not a war against Islam. The bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade was not a war against Islam. The buildup of the Taliban and Al-Queda in Pakistan and in Afghanistan was certainly not a war against Islam. So we must agree with the Bushmen: This is not a war against Islam. It is just another episode of the war against humanity, a war the U.S. establishment has been relentlessly conducting for decade after decade. The destruction of Afghanistan was not a war against Islam. It was business as usual, really.
Month after month, all the news bulletins and news channels had "anchormen" or "experts" parading in front of huge maps of Afghanistan & Iraq, explaining the detail of the military assault on these countries. We were told of the type of bomber used and from what base, the aircraft carriers from where the tomahawk missiles were fired. Sometimes we were told of the "payload delivered".
Moreover, not a hint of the devastation these "payloads" delivered to the people of Afghanistan & Iraq. The awful terror they brought, the devastation, the injury, the slaughter.
We became morally desensitized to the abominations that are clinically conveyed to us night after night on our globally broadcast television screens.
Nobody at any of the news conferences challenged George Bush or Tony Blair or Donald Rumsfeld or Colin Powell about the outrages they were perpetrating. We were all part of the consensus that it was OK to bomb a country to a pulp with the vastness of the military might the world has ever known.
How did the world get to believe that terror and slaughter delivered by a bomb in a car was an atrocity, while much more terror and much more slaughter delivered by airplane or missile is morally OK?
And all for what?
Is it claimed that the attack on America of September 11 could have been planned, directed and co-ordinated from caves in Afghanistan. Or that the organization that was responsible for that attack originated in Afghanistan. A great deal of the emerging evidence suggests otherwise.
The reality is that Afghanistan & Iraq are being devastated and hundreds are being slaughtered, just as was the case with the Persian Gulf War in 1991, to gain access to the region's abundant petroleum resources. U.S. influence and military presence in Afghanistan, Iraq and the Central Asian states, not unlike that over the oil-rich Persian Gulf states, would be a major strategic gain, and the prospect of a military presence in a region extending from Turkey to Tajikistan could not have escaped U.S. strategists.
Where the "great game" in Afghanistan was once about czars and commissars seeking access to the warm water ports of the Persian Gulf, today it is about laying oil and gas pipelines to the untapped petroleum reserves of Central Asia. According to testimony before the US House of Representatives in March 1999 by the conservative American think tank Heritage Foundation, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan together have 15 billion barrels of proven oil reserves. The same countries also have proven gas deposits totaling not less than nine trillion cubic meters. Another study by the Institute for Afghan Studies placed the total worth of oil and gas reserves in the Central Asian republics at around US$3 trillion at 2001 prices.
According to the U.S. strategists, not only can Afghanistan play a role in hosting pipelines connecting Central Asia to international markets, but the country itself has significant oil and gas deposits. During the Soviets' decade-long occupation of Afghanistan, Moscow estimated Afghanistan's proven and probable natural gas reserves at around five trillion cubic feet and production reached 275 million cubic feet per day in the mid-1970s. But sabotage by anti-Soviet mujahideen (freedom fighters) and by rival groups in the civil war that followed Soviet withdrawal in 1989 virtually closed down gas production and ended deals for the supply of gas to several European countries.
Natural gas production and distribution under Afghanistan's Taliban rulers was the responsibility of the Afghan Gas Enterprise, which, in 1999, began repair of a pipeline to Mazar-i-Sharif city. Afghanistan's proven and probable oil and condensate reserves were placed at 95 million barrels by the Soviets. So far, attempts to exploit Afghanistan's petroleum reserves or take advantage of its unique geographical location as a crossroads to markets in Europe and South Asia have been thwarted by the continuing instability.
In 1998, the California-based UNOCAL, which held 46.5 percent stakes in Central Asia Gas (CentGas), a consortium that planned an ambitious gas pipeline across Afghanistan, withdrew in frustration after several fruitless years. The pipeline was to stretch 1,271km from Turkmenistan's Dauletabad fields to Multan in Pakistan at an estimated cost of $1.9 billion. An additional $600 million would have brought the pipeline to energy-hungry India.
Energy experts in India have long been urging the country's planners to ensure access to petroleum products from the Central Asian republics, with which New Delhi has traditionally maintained good relations. Other partners in CentGas included the Saudi Arabian Delta Oil Company, the Government of Turkmenistan, Indonesia Petroleum (INPEX), the Japanese ITOCHU, Korean Hyundai, and Pakistan's Crescent Group.
According to observers, one problem Was the uncertainty over who the beneficiaries in Afghanistan should be. But the immediate reason for UNOCAL's withdrawal was undoubtedly the US cruise missile attacks on Osama bin Laden's training camps in Afghanistan in August 1998, done in retaliation for the bombing of its embassies in Africa. UNOCAL then stated that the project would have to wait until Afghanistan achieved the "peace and stability necessary to obtain financing from international agencies and a government that is recognized by the United States and the United Nations".
The "coalition against terrorism" that US President George W Bush built is the first opportunity that has any chance of making UNOCAL's wish come true. If the coalition succeeds, it has the potential of "reconfiguring substantially the energy scenarios for the 21st century".
So, shall we ask ourselves, once again, who benefited the most out of the September 11 attacks on the U.S. soil?
The unbelievable horror perpetrated on the cities of New York and Washington is a problem-reaction-solution sting on the collective mind of all humanity. Fast as the world was being moved towards globalization, it was still not fast enough to match the timescale demanded by the U.S. agenda. And the opposition to their globalization plans was gathering momentum by the day. It was clear that something of enormous magnitude was being orchestrated that would so devastate the collective human mind with fear, horror, and insecurity, that "solutions" could be offered that would advance the agenda in a colossal leap almost overnight. This is what we saw in America on the ritually significant eleventh day of the ninth month - 911 is the number for emergencies in the United States.
And, mind numbing as these atrocities are, this is the start, not the end, of the next cycle of an agenda for the mental, emotional, spiritual, and physical imprisonment of humankind. More and more death and destruction unfold as the "Free World" unites as an (in affect) world army and world government to use the threat of "terrorism" (their own) to justify a war against the people and countries they choose to take the rap for what the very forces WITHIN the "free world" are themselves responsible for. Even war with the Islamic peoples is not the end, but the means to an end - a conflict with the remaining forces of communism (such as North Korea).
Remember that the Americans operate through every country and within "terrorist" organizations and those agencies, which "oppose" such terrorism. Only by having agents within all "sides" can they be sure of controlling the game and knowing the outcome before it starts. The Americans have operatives within the Islamic world, just as they have them in the so-called "free world", as we saw in the months after September 11. Saddam Hussein was every bit as much a knowing American pawn as Father George and Boy George Bush in America, for example.
The predictability of the ritualistic, emotionless mind can be seen in the news management that has followed this U.S. disaster. Look at what always happens in these circumstances and you will see that the blueprint is the same in almost every case. Before the event happens, the fall guy or "patsy" is already set up to take the blame, thus steering the public mind away from dangerous speculation and onto a pre-ordained target. After the Kennedy assassination, it was Lee Harvey Oswald; after Oklahoma, it was Timothy McVeigh; now it is Osama Bin Laden.

Bin Laden, deeply misguided as he may be, is no more responsible for what happened in the U.S. Than I am. His name was introduced with the most obvious co-ordination immediately after the disaster unfolded in the same way that the background to Lee Harvey Oswald was being circulated BEFORE President Kennedy was even dead.
The idea that this guy from the mountains of Afghanistan with far more mouth than substance could be the "Mr. Big" of this enormous operation is utterly insulting to anyone of even basic intelligence. We are not talking a parcel bomb here, nor even some freedom fighter driving a car bomb into a restaurant in Jerusalem. Four commercial airliners had to be simultaneously hi-jacked in American air space via American airports and flown into highly specific targets within 45 minutes of each other. How was this possible? Because it was an inside job, that is how, orchestrated by forces WITHIN the United States and planned by the highest levels of U.S. "Intelligence" in co-ordination with other strands of the American spider's web worldwide.
This terror was not a failure of U.S. Intelligence for God's sake. They were not supposed to uncover the plot and getting weapons onto planes is so much easier if you have support from those who control the system. I have heard that this was another "Pearl Harbor" and yes, it was. Studies show how the American government knew the Japanese were going to attack Pearl Harbor, but they did nothing about it. Why? Because they wanted it to happen for a specific reason - to justify the U.S. entry into the Second World War, which President Roosevelt had said, just to get elected, that America would not be involved in. Problem-reaction-solution - and it is the same with the terrible events of 911.
In the immediate aftermath of the attacks, the "pin it on bin Laden" campaign was launched as per pre-arranged plan. The Republican Senator, Orrin Hatch, for example, told CNN that he had high-level information from the FBI that bin Laden was behind the unprecedented attacks. "I do have some information," Hatch said in reference to his FBI briefing. "They've come to the conclusion that this looks like it may be the signature of Osama bin Laden, that he may be the one behind this." It is OK, do not go on, Orrin, we get the message and you have done your job.
Then we had the story of the hired car found so conveniently at Boston airport, where two planes were hijacked, which contained…yes…wait for it…a copy of the Koran and an instruction video for how to fly commercial jets!!! Am I in fairyland or what? I am surprised they did not claim to have discovered a letter from bin Laden in the car wishing the occupants the best of luck with their task. Its unbelievable nonsense, of course it is, but most people believed it. And you saw more and more manufactured "evidence" of the "bin Laden connection" systematically revealed in the days, weeks and months after 911.
Funnily enough the question "who benefits from these horrific events in America?" can be answered very simply: The disaster of 9-11, meant that:
 The American warmongers now had the excuse to retaliate against anyone their propaganda machine could manipulate the world population to believe was to blame. Attacks against Islamic targets had the potential to be the trigger for massive conflict and upheaval across the world and especially in the Middle and Near East. The opportunities to then widen the conflict to involve Russia and China were endless. A third world war was part of the agenda and this can open the way for that as the dominoes fall.
 The "free world united with America" rhetoric from Blair and other "world leaders" was code for coming together as a world army and police force to fight a "war against terrorism". Already the NATO (the world army in waiting) had pledged such support and the collective consciousness was being manipulated so comprehensively at that time that most people supported American and NATO terrorist attacks on unsubstantiated targets in the name of fighting terrorism. The stunning contradiction in this policy was lost on the majority blinded by the blatant and intense mind manipulation that followed the outrages in those U.S. cities.
 As conflict escalated as a result of such calculated "retaliation" the pressure for centralization of military power and the willingness to concede that power by the populations of America and elsewhere gathered until the world army was in place, a world army with the power to attack and take over any country that their propaganda machine can demonize.
 The collective mind of humanity, and particularly that of America, is understandably now in a deeply traumatized state. They have been subjected to collective trauma-based mind control and, as any mind controller or researcher can tell you, a traumatized mind is a suggestible mind. So in the wake of the trauma comes the programming to manipulate the population to see events in the desired fashion.
 One of the biggest potential obstacles to the "New World Order", the centrally controlled global state, is the psyche of most American people. When faced with the prospect of giving up their right of self-determination to global military, political, and financial control, most would be vehemently opposed once they realized what was happening. Their collective sense of security, confidence, and pride in their nation and system has been built on the foundations of immense military and financial strength. It is a collective version of the John Wayne mentality - "don't mess with us - this is America." From that has come their collective confidence in themselves as a nation. Now that very sense of whom they are, and their belief that they have the power to stand alone, is in danger of being devastated.
 It is absolutely no co-incidence that the targets of those hi-jacked planes were the very symbols of America's sense of itself and its own security - the Pentagon, symbol of their military might, and the World Trade Center, twin pillars of their financial might. This was not primarily an attack on America, it was an attack on America's image and imagination of itself. Break their spirit and their sense of being "American"; break America's confidence in itself; put it in fear and fundamental insecurity; and you have overcome the most significant opposition to America allowing itself to be absorbed into the planned global and centrally-dictated society. The American psyche has been bombarded with more and more shocks to its security and sense of self, as with Oklahoma and the school shootings in the past. But from then on everything increased dramatically. It is vital that Americans refuse to submit to this and realize that those who are condemning the terrorism in their midst are those who are responsible for it.
 An economic disaster has long been predicted by those who have exposed and studied the American agenda. To overcome resistance to single currencies and central control of global finance, they needed a world economic crash that would destroy the present system and kid the people into accepting centralized global control as the only way to overcome the crash. Problem-reaction-solution. This is another reason why these attacks struck in the very heart of America's economic system - and why in the days before the carnage the talk of a global economic recession was plastered across the world media. Now they had a blank sheet of paper with the chance to justify such a collapse and you sawe global economic bodies brought in to "co-ordinate a response to the economic crisis". Indeed the G7 grouping of nations had already begun this process.
These are just a few of the "benefits" to the agenda from the death and destruction in New York and Washington that was, I repeat, co-ordinated by forces within U.S. borders. Those responsible are possessed by those who have no regard for human life any more than most humans have regard for the death and suffering of cattle. The warmonger’s mind has an undeveloped emotional level and therefore there is no emotional consequence for them no matter to what depths of horror and depravity they may sink. You only had to watch the emotionless, going-through-the-motions, reading the script, responses of George W. Bush and Tony Blair, the UK Prime Minister, in the face of such immense suffering to see an example of this. It was in the class of the Queen of England after the murder of Princess Diana. At least Reagan was a professional actor. Bush and Blair would not get in a school play.
Did George W. Bush know that these devastating disasters were going to happen that day? What do you think?? Did Tony Blair? What do you think?? But even they were only pawns in a game controlled by far greater powers and they were as expendable as anyone once they had served their purpose. Personally I would not be surprised in the least if Bush was sacrificed eventually to advance the "global terrorism" scenario, and perhaps someone very close to Blair also.
The world will never be the same again, that is true, but within every danger there is opportunity. And for those of us, the vast majority, who seek peace not conflict, freedom-for-all, not dictatorship-by-the-few, now have to look ourselves in the mirror and ask what we are going to do to stop these lunatics from taking over their asylum.

Complaining is not good enough any more. Running is no longer an option because soon there will be nowhere to run. LOSE FEAR AND BE IRREVERENT IN THE FACE OF THIS ARROGANT DICTATORSHIP. IT CAN ONLY SURVIVE IF WE ARE FRIGHTENED OF IT AND INTIMIDATED BY IT.

There is so much we can do if only we first decide that we want to dedicate our lives to this with an unbreakable determination that will not concede to any level of intimidation or consequences.
The Dragon is nothing like as powerful as they want us to believe it is.

Come on, what are we waiting for? Let us take a look at the other side of the mirror.